The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Resistance Training Improves Insulin Sensitivity in NIDDM Subjects Without Altering Maximal Oxygen Uptake
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of resistance training on insulin sensitivity in nonobese NIDDM patients. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Previously sedentary nonobese NIDDM patients were enrolled in a resistance training group (RT; n = 9) or used as sedentary control subjects (SED; n = 8). SED subjects did not perform exercise training because of orthopedic disorders. The training program consisted of two sets of nine exercises with 10–20 repetitions. Subjects trained five times a week for 4–6 weeks. Insulin sensitivity, as assessed by the hyper-insulinemic-euglycemic clamp technique, HbAIc, and body composition, was measured before and after the training period. Maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) and quadriceps strength were measured in the RT group. RESULTS: The two groups did not differ significantly on any variables before participation in the program. The glucose disposal rate during the hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp increased 48% in the RT group (6.85 ± 1.86 to 10.12 ± 3.15 mg · kg−1 lean body mass · min−1; P < 0.05), but remained unchanged in the SED group (5.95 ± 1.63 to 6.36 ± 1.61 mg · kg−1 lean body mass · min−1). There was no significant change in body composition in either group. In the RT group, a 16% increase in quadriceps strength (191.1 ± 45.8 to 216.9 ± 42.8 Nm; P < 0.05) but no significant change (27.6 ± 5.0 to 28.6 ± 6.5 ml · kg−1 · min−1) in VO2max was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Moderate-intensity, high-volume resistance training improves insulin sensitivity in nonobese NIDDM without altering VO2max.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Colberg, S. R., Sigal, R. J., Fernhall, B., Regensteiner, J. G., Blissmer, B. J., Rubin, R. R., Chasan-Taber, L., Albright, A. L., & Braun, B. (2010) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc10-9990 · Cited by 1,955
“Resistance exercise training also benefits BG control and insulin action in type 2 diabetes (46,65,115,116,118,246).”
Physical Activity/Exercise and Type 2 Diabetes
Sigal, R. J., Kenny, G. P., Wasserman, D. H., Castaneda-Sceppa, C., & White, R. D. (2006) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc06-9910 · Cited by 949
Castaneda, C., Layne, J. E., Munoz-Orians, L., Gordon, P. L., Walsmith, J., Foldvari, M., Roubenoff, R., Tucker, K. L., & Nelson, M. E. (2002) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.25.12.2335 · Cited by 844
Snowling, N. J., & Hopkins, W. G. (2006) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc06-1317 · Cited by 813
High-intensity resistance training improves glycemic control in older patients with type 2 diabetes
Dunstan, D. W., Daly, R. M., Owen, N., Jolley, D., de Courten, M., Shaw, J., & Zimmet, P. (2002) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.25.10.1729 · Cited by 771
Metadata
- Authors
- Ishii, T., Yamakita, T., Sato, T., Tanaka, S., & Fujii, S.
- Venue
- Diabetes Care
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 1998-08-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1353-1355
- ISSN
- 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-5548
- OpenAlex
- W2125537518
- Cited by
- 277
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Resistance Training Improves Insulin Sensitivity in NIDDM Subjects Without Altering Maximal Oxygen Uptake. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/diacare.21.8.1353
- The paper
- Ishii, T., Yamakita, T., Sato, T., Tanaka, S., & Fujii, S. (1998). Resistance Training Improves Insulin Sensitivity in NIDDM Subjects Without Altering Maximal Oxygen Uptake. Diabetes Care. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.21.8.1353
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.