Cited by 771Physical Activity and HealthDiabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

High-intensity resistance training improves glycemic control in older patients with type 2 diabetes

Open access
Dunstan, David W., Daly, Robin M., Owen, Neville, Jolley, Damien, de Courten, Maximilian, Shaw, Jonathan, Zimmet, Paul·2002·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE—To examine the effect of high-intensity progressive resistance training combined with moderate weight loss on glycemic control and body composition in older patients with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—Sedentary, overweight men and women with type 2 diabetes, aged 60–80 years (n = 36), were randomized to high-intensity progressive resistance training plus moderate weight loss (RT & WL group) or moderate weight loss plus a control program (WL group). Clinical and laboratory measurements were assessed at 0, 3, and 6 months. RESULTS—HbA1c fell significantly more in RT & WL than WL at 3 months (0.6 ± 0.7 vs. 0.07 ± 0.8%, P < 0.05) and 6 months (1.2 ± 1.0 vs. 0.4 ± 0.8%, P < 0.05). Similar reductions in body weight (RT & WL 2.5 ± 2.9 vs. WL 3.1 ± 2.1 kg) and fat mass (RT & WL 2.4 ± 2.7 vs. WL 2.7 ± 2.5 kg) were observed after 6 months. In contrast, lean body mass (LBM) increased in the RT & WL group (0.5 ± 1.1 kg) and decreased in the WL group (0.4 ± 1.0) after 6 months (P < 0.05). There were no between-group differences for fasting glucose, insulin, serum lipids and lipoproteins, or resting blood pressure. CONCLUSIONS—High-intensity progressive resistance training, in combination with moderate weight loss, was effective in improving glycemic control in older patients with type 2 diabetes. Additional benefits of improved muscular strength and LBM identify high-intensity resistance training as a feasible and effective component in the management program for older patients with type 2 diabetes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/diacare.25.10.1729

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Resistance exercise training also benefits blood glucose control and insulin action in type 2 diabetes.

    “Resistance exercise training also benefits BG control and insulin action in type 2 diabetes ( 46 , 65 , 115 , 116 , 118 , 246 ).”

    From Exercise and Type 2 Diabetes (2010) · cites this paper as [65]

    The discussion (p. 5) reports that high-intensity resistance training improved HbA1c in older patients with type 2 diabetes, supporting the blood-glucose-control claim. It also reports improved insulin sensitivity in earlier studies, but this trial found no significant between-group difference in HOMA-estimated insulin sensitivity (p. 6). Thus, this source does not establish an insulin-action benefit in its own participants. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Exercise intervention studies showing the greatest effect on blood glucose control have all involved supervision of exercise sessions by qualified exercise trainers.

    “Exercise intervention studies showing the greatest effect on BG control have all involved supervision of exercise sessions by qualified exercise trainers ( 34 , 65 , 196 , 238 ).”

    From Exercise and Type 2 Diabetes (2010) · cites this paper as [65]

    The Exercise intervention section (p. 2) says all sessions in this study were supervised, and the Results (p. 1) report improved HbA1c. The paper does not establish that the studies with the greatest effects all used supervision, or identify the supervisors as qualified exercise trainers. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Twelve RCTs compared the effects of a dietary weight loss intervention alone to a combination of the same dietary intervention with an exercise intervention in older persons.

    “Twelve RCTs were identified that compared the effects of a dietary weight loss intervention alone to a combination of the same dietary intervention with an exercise intervention in older persons (288)(289)(290)(291)(292)(293)(294)(295)(296)(297)(298)(299).”
  • For several physical and strength-performance measures, greater improvements were observed in the combined groups than in the diet-only groups.

    “Moreover, for several physical and strengthperformance measures, greater improvements were observed in the combined groups than in the diet-only groups (288-291, 293-297, 299).”
  • In ten trials, a weight-reducing diet alone resulted in the desired weight loss, which consisted of fat mass as well as lean mass.

    “In ten trials, a weight-reducing diet alone resulted in the desired weight loss, which consisted of fat mass as well as lean mass (290)(291)(292)(294)(295)(296)(297)(298)(299).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [21]21. Blair SN: How to assess exercise habits and physical fitness. In Behavioral Health . Miller NE, Matarazzo JD, Weiss SM, Herd JA, Eds. New York, John Wiley &amp; Sons, 1984, p. 424-447

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dunstan, D. W., Daly, R. M., Owen, N., Jolley, D., de Courten, M., Shaw, J., & Zimmet, P.
Affiliations
  • International Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Australia
  • Deakin University (AU)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2002-10-01
Volume
25
Issue
10
Pages
1729-1736
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2111388675
Cited by
771
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 51 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 37
FWCI
5.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
  • Deakin Research Online (Deakin University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
high-intensity resistance training, type 2 diabetes, older adults, glycemic control, HbA1c, weight loss, body composition, lean body mass, fat mass
MeSH terms
Adipose Tissue, Age Factors, Aged, Blood Glucose, Body Height, Body Weight, Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diet, Diabetic, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Exercise, Body Mass Index

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review