The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Time-action profile of the long-acting insulin analog insulin glargine (HOE901) in comparison with those of NPH insulin and placebo.
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To study the pharmacodynamic properties of the subcutaneously injected long-acting insulin analog HOE901 (30 microg/ml zinc) in comparison with those of NPH insulin and placebo. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In this single-center double-blind euglycemic glucose clamp study, 15 healthy male volunteers (aged 27 +/- 4 years, BMI 22.2 +/- 1.8 kg/m2) received single subcutaneous injections of 0.4 U/kg body wt of HOE901, NPH insulin, or placebo on 3 study days in a randomized order. The necessary glucose infusion rates (GIRs) to keep blood glucose concentrations constant at 5.0 mmol/l were determined over a 30-h period after administration. RESULTS: The injection of HOE901 did not induce the pronounced peak in metabolic activity observed with NPH insulin (GIRmax 5.3 +/- 1.1 vs. 7.7 +/- 1.3 mg x kg(-1) x min(-1)) (P < 0.05); after an initial rise, metabolic activity was rather constant over the study period. This lack of peak was confirmed by a lower glucose consumption in the first 4 h after injection (area under the curve from 0 to 4 h [AUC(0-4 h)] 1.02 +/- 0.34 vs. 1.48 +/- 0.34 g/kg) (P < 0.001) with HOE901, as compared with NPH insulin. In this single-dose study, the metabolic effect measured over a period of 30 h was lower with HOE901 than with NPH insulin (AUC(0-30 h) 7.93 +/- 1.82 vs. 9.24 +/- 1.29 g/kg) (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the soluble long-acting insulin analog HOE901 induces a smoother metabolic effect than NPH insulin, from which a better substitution of basal insulin requirements may follow.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Riddle (2003) · doi:10.2337/diacare.26.11.3080 · Cited by 1,479
Lepore, M., Pampanelli, S., Fanelli, C., Porcellati, F., Bartocci, L., Di Vincenzo, A., Cordoni, C., Costa, E., Brunetti, P., & Bolli, G. B. (2000) · Diabetes · doi:10.2337/diabetes.49.12.2142 · Cited by 818
Hirsch, I. B. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra040832 · Cited by 667
Update on the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus
Marín-Peñalver, J. J., Martín-Timón, I., Sevillano-Collantes, C., & Cañizo-Gómez, F. J. D. (2016) · World Journal of Diabetes · doi:10.4239/wjd.v7.i17.354 · Cited by 647
Heise, T., Nosek, L., Rønn, B. B., Endahl, L., Heinemann, L., Kapitza, C., & Draeger, E. (2004) · Diabetes · doi:10.2337/diabetes.53.6.1614 · Cited by 614
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Heinemann, L., Linkeschova, R., Rave, K., Hompesch, B., Sedlak, M., & Heise, T.
- Venue
- Diabetes Care
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 2000-05-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 644-649
- ISSN
- 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-5548
- OpenAlex
- W2058777107
- Cited by
- 473
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Time-action profile of the long-acting insulin analog insulin glargine (HOE901) in comparison with those of NPH insulin and placebo. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/diacare.23.5.644
- The paper
- Heinemann, L., Linkeschova, R., Rave, K., Hompesch, B., Sedlak, M., & Heise, T. (2000). Time-action profile of the long-acting insulin analog insulin glargine (HOE901) in comparison with those of NPH insulin and placebo. Diabetes Care. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.23.5.644
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.