Cited by 219Diabetes and associated disordersDiabetes Management and ResearchGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

Genetic, autoimmune, and clinical characteristics of childhood- and adult-onset type 1 diabetes.

Sabbah, E, Savola, K, Ebeling, T, Kulmala, P, Vähäsalo, P, Ilonen, J, Salmela, P I, Knip, M·2000·Diabetes Care

Abstract

Objective To assess whether there are any differences in genetic, autoimmune, or clinical features between type 1 diabetes presenting in childhood and that diagnosed later. Research design and methods We studied 352 individuals (252 children and adolescents or =20 years of age) manifesting clinical signs of type 1 diabetes over a period of 7.5 years at a university hospital in northern Finland with a primary catchment area population of approximately 300,000. The patients were analyzed for susceptible and protective HLA-DQB1 alleles (*02, *0302, *0301, *0602, *0603, and *0604), islet cell antibodies (ICA), insulin autoantibodies, and antibodies to GAD and IA-2 (IA-2A). Their clinical symptoms and signs were recorded at diagnosis. Results The adult patients carried the high-risk DQB1*02/0302 genotype less frequently than the children and more often had protective genotypes. They also had a decreased frequency of all 4 single autoantibody specificities and of multiple (> or =3) autoantibodies. The proportion of patients testing negative for all autoantibodies was lower among the children than among the adults. IA-2A were associated with the DQB1*0302/x genotype in both the children and adults, and the same held true for ICA among the adults. The adults were characterized by a higher proportion of males, a longer duration of symptoms, and a lower frequency of infections during the preceding 3 months. In addition, they had a higher relative body weight on admission and milder sig…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/diacare.23.9.1326

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sabbah, E., Savola, K., Ebeling, T., Kulmala, P., Vähäsalo, P., Ilonen, J., Salmela, P. I., & Knip, M.
Affiliations
University of Oulu (FI)
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2000-09-01
Volume
23
Issue
9
Pages
1326-1332
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2135424904
Cited by
219
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 14
FWCI
4.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
type 1 diabetes, age of onset, childhood-onset diabetes, type 2 diabetes, HLA-DQB1, islet cell antibodies, insulin autoantibodies, glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies, IA-2 autoantibodies, islet autoimmunity, metabolic decompensation, HbA1c, genetic susceptibility
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Alleles, Histocompatibility Antigens Class II, Autoantibodies, Blood Glucose, Body Weight, C-Peptide, Child, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Female, Finland, Glutamate Decarboxylase, Glycated Hemoglobin, HLA-DQ Antigens, Hospitals, University, Humans, Islets of Langerhans, Male, Age of Onset, HLA-DQ beta-Chains

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review