The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Behavioral interventions for adolescents with type 1 diabetes: how effective are they?
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of behavioral interventions for adolescents with type 1 diabetes based on a systematic review of the literature. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The literature was identified by searching 11 electronic databases, hand-searching 3 journals from their start dates, and contacting individual researchers. Only articles that reported evaluations of behavioral (including educational and psychosocial) interventions for adolescents (age range 9-21 years) with type 1 diabetes that included a control group were included in the present review. Data summarizing the key features of the interventions and their effects were extracted from each article. Where possible, effect sizes for the randomized control trials (RCTs) were calculated. RESULTS: The search process identified 64 reports of empirical studies. Of these, 35 studies included a control group, and 24 were RCTs. Effect sizes could be calculated for 18 interventions. The overall mean effect size calculated across all outcomes was 0.33 (median 0.21), indicating that these interventions have a small- to medium-sized beneficial effect on diabetes management. Interventions that were theoretically based were significantly more effective than those that were not (P<0.05, 1-tailed). CONCLUSIONS: Research to date indicates that these interventions are moderately effective. Several methodological weaknesses to be avoided in future studies are noted. It is also recommended that investigators use the reach, efficacy, adoption, implementation, and maintenance (RE-AIM) framework to guide the design of future studies, which should result in more disseminable interventions. RE-AIM assesses the intervention's reach, or percent or representativeness of patients willing to participate; efficacy across a range of outcomes; adoption, or the percent and representativeness of settings willing to implement the intervention; implementation, or the consistency of the delivery of the intervention as intended; and maintenance, or the extent to which delivery of the intervention becomes a routine part of health care in the medical setting.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, this negative result also aligns with past research which has sometimes shown a more robust response for psychosocial versus glycemic outcomes following behavioral interventions in persons with type 1 diabetes [30].”
From A nonrandomized pilot of a group, video-based telehealth intervention to reduce diabetes distress in parents of youth with type 1 diabetes mellitus (2022) · cites this paper as [30]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Franklin, V. L., Waller, A., Pagliari, C., & Greene, S. A. (2006) · Diabetic Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1464-5491.2006.01989.x · Cited by 543
Association between adherence and glycemic control in pediatric type 1 diabetes: a meta-analysis
Hood, K. K., Peterson, C. M., Rohan, J. M., & Drotar, D. (2009) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2009-0207 · Cited by 347
Diabetes distress among adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a systematic review
Hagger, V., Hendrieckx, C., Sturt, J., Skinner, T. C., & Speight, J. (2016) · Current Diabetes Reports · doi:10.1007/s11892-015-0694-2 · Cited by 338
Self-citationIncreasing diabetes self-management education in community settingsA systematic review
NORRIS, S., Nichols, P., Caspersen, C. J., GLASGOW, R., Engelgau, M. M., JACKJR, L., Snyder, S. R., Carande-Kulis, V. G., Isham, G., & Garfield, S. A. (2002) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0749-3797(02)00424-5 · Cited by 331
Delamater, A. M., de Wit, M., McDarby, V., Malik, J. A., Hilliard, M. E., Northam, E., & Acerini, C. L. (2018) · Pediatric Diabetes · doi:10.1111/pedi.12736 · Cited by 279
“Previous systematic reviews of the literature and meta-analysis (172-174) indicate that a number of controlled studies have shown the efficacy of psychosocial and behavioral interventions for children and adolescents with diabetes, although this literature is not without some methodological limitations (5, 6, 172, 175…”
Metadata
- Authors
- Hampson, S. E., Skinner, T. C., Hart, J., Storey, L., Gage, H., Foxcroft, D., Kimber, A., Cradock, S., & McEvilly, E. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Surrey (GB)
- Venue
- Diabetes Care
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 2000-09-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1416-1422
- ISSN
- 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-5548
- OpenAlex
- W1982725668
- Cited by
- 134
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 3.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Open Research (University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
- ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
- Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
- Diabetes Care
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Keywords
- type 1 diabetes, adolescents, behavioral interventions, diabetes self-management, psychosocial interventions, educational intervention, intervention effectiveness, theory-based intervention, RE-AIM framework, intervention dissemination
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Psychology, Adolescent, Adult, Behavior Therapy, Child, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Humans, Periodicals as Topic, Databases, Bibliographic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review