Cited by 98Diabetes Management and EducationHealth Policy Implementation ScienceHealth Sciences Research and Education

The Translating Research Into Action for Diabetes (TRIAD) Study

The TRIAD Study Group·2002·Diabetes Care

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/diacare.25.2.386

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
The TRIAD Study Group
Corresponding author
The TRIAD Study Group
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2002-02-01
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
386-389
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W4235544294
Cited by
98
References
21
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 8
FWCI
3.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
Keywords
diabetes research, research utilization
MeSH terms
Diabetes Mellitus, Humans, Managed Care Programs, Multicenter Studies as Topic, Outcome Assessment, Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review