Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 212

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Intensive Lifestyle Changes Are Necessary to Improve Insulin Sensitivity

McAuley, Kirsten A., Williams, Sheila M., Mann, Jim I., Goulding, Ailsa, Chisholm, Alex, Wilson, Noela, Story, Gretchen, McLay, Rebecca T., Harper, Michelle J., Jones, Ianthe E.·2002·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE—The extent to which lifestyle must be altered to improve insulin sensitivity has not been established. This study compares the effect on insulin sensitivity of current dietary and exercise recommendations with a more intensive intervention in normoglycemic insulin-resistant individuals. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—Seventy-nine normoglycemic insulin-resistant (determined by the euglycemic insulin clamp) men and women were randomized to either a control group or one of two combined dietary and exercise programs. One group (modest level) was based on current recommendations and the other on a more intensive dietary and exercise program. Insulin sensitivity was measured using a euglycemic insulin clamp, body composition was measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, and anthropometry and aerobic fitness were assessed before and after a 4-month intervention period. Four-day dietary intakes were recorded, and fasting glucose, insulin, and lipids were measured. RESULTS—Only the intensive group showed a significant improvement in insulin sensitivity (23% increase, P=0.006 vs. 9% in the modest group, P=0.23). This was associated with a significant improvement in aerobic fitness (11% increase in the intensive group, P=0.02 vs. 1% in the modest group, P=0.94) and a greater fiber intake, but no difference in reported total or saturated dietary fat. CONCLUSIONS—Current clinical dietary and exercise recommendations, even when vigorously implemented, did not significantly improve insulin sensitivity; however, a more intensive program did. Improved aerobic fitness appeared to be the major difference between the two intervention groups, although weight loss and diet composition may have also played an important role in determining insulin sensitivity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/diacare.25.3.445

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 212

Metadata

Authors
McAuley, K. A., Williams, S. M., Mann, J. I., Goulding, A., Chisholm, A., Wilson, N., Story, G., McLay, R. T., Harper, M. J., & Jones, I. E.
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2002-03-01
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
445-452
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W1971638892
Cited by
212
References
7
FWCI
8.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intensive Lifestyle Changes Are Necessary to Improve Insulin Sensitivity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/diacare.25.3.445
The paper
McAuley, K. A., Williams, S. M., Mann, J. I., Goulding, A., Chisholm, A., Wilson, N., Story, G., McLay, R. T., Harper, M. J., & Jones, I. E. (2002). Intensive Lifestyle Changes Are Necessary to Improve Insulin Sensitivity. Diabetes Care. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.25.3.445

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.