The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Amputation and Mortality in New-Onset Diabetic Foot Ulcers Stratified by Etiology
Abstract
OBJECTIVE—Foot ulcers and their complications are an important cause of morbidity and mortality in diabetes. The present study aims to examine the long-term outcome in terms of amputations and mortality in patients with new-onset diabetic foot ulcers in subgroups stratified by etiology. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—Patients presenting with new ulcers (duration <1 month) to a dedicated diabetic foot clinic between 1994 and 1998 were studied. Outcomes were determined until March 2000 (or death) from podiatry, hospital, and district registers. Baseline clinical examination was done to classify ulcers as neuropathic, ischemic, or neuroischemic. Five-year amputation and mortality rates were derived from Kaplan-Meier survival analysis curves. RESULTS—Of the 185 patients studied, 41% had peripheral vascular disease (PVD) and 61% had neuropathy; 45%, 16%, and 24% of patients had neuropathic, ischemic, and neuroischemic ulcers, respectively. The mean follow-up period was 34 months (range 1–65) including survivors and patients who died during the study period. Five-year amputation rates were higher for ischemic (29%) and neuroischemic (25%) than neuropathic (11%) ulcers. Five-year mortality was 45%, 18%, and 55% for neuropathic, neuroischemic, and ischemic ulcers, respectively. Mortality was higher in ischemic ulcers than neuropathic ulcers. On multivariate regression analysis, only increasing age predicted shorter survival time. CONCLUSIONS—All types of diabetic foot ulcers are associated with high morbidity and mortality. The increased mortality appears to be independent of factors increasing ulcer risk—that is, neuropathy and PVD—in patients with established foot ulcers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Psychological status of diabetic people with or without lower limb disability
Carrington, A. L., Mawdsley, S. K. V., Morley, M., Kincey, J., & Boulton, A. J. M. (1996) · Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/0168-8227(96)01198-9 · Cited by 201
Cited by
Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease (TASC II)
Norgren, L., Hiatt, W. R., Dormandy, J. A., Nehler, M. R., Harris, K. A., & Fowkes, F. G. R. (2007) · Journal of Vascular Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2006.12.037 · Cited by 8,191
Prompers, L., Huijberts, M., Apelqvist, J., Jude, E., Piaggesi, A., Bakker, K., Edmonds, M., Holstein, P., Jirkovska, A., Mauricio, D., et al. (2007) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/s00125-006-0491-1 · Cited by 1,023
Armstrong, D. G., Swerdlow, M. A., Armstrong, A. A., Conte, M. S., Padula, W. V., & Bus, S. A. (2020) · Journal of Foot and Ankle Research · doi:10.1186/s13047-020-00383-2 · Cited by 975
(2007) · Endocrine Practice · doi:10.4158/ep.13.s1.1 · Cited by 699
Guest Editorial: are diabetes‐related wounds and amputations worse than cancer?
Armstrong, D. G., Wrobel, J., & Robbins, J. M. (2007) · International Wound Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1742-481x.2007.00392.x · Cited by 456
Metadata
- Authors
- Moulik, P. K., Mtonga, R., & Gill, G. V.
- Venue
- Diabetes Care
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 2003-02-01
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 491-494
- ISSN
- 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-5548
- OpenAlex
- W2156782167
- Cited by
- 613
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Amputation and Mortality in New-Onset Diabetic Foot Ulcers Stratified by Etiology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/diacare.26.2.491
- The paper
- Moulik, P. K., Mtonga, R., & Gill, G. V. (2003). Amputation and Mortality in New-Onset Diabetic Foot Ulcers Stratified by Etiology. Diabetes Care. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.26.2.491
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.