The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Poor Prognosis of Young Adults With Type 1 Diabetes
Abstract
OBJECTIVE—To determine the role of early behavioral and psychological factors on later outcomes in young adults with childhood- or adolescent-onset type 1 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—We conducted a longitudinal cohort study of patients recruited from the register of the young adult outpatient diabetes clinic, Oxford, U.K. A total of 113 individuals (51 male subjects) aged 17–25 years completed assessments, and 87 (77%) were reinterviewed as older adults (aged 28–37 years). Longitudinal assessments were made of glycemic control (HbA1c) and complications. Psychological state at baseline was assessed using the Present State Examination and self-report Symptom Checklist, with corresponding interview schedules administered at follow-up. RESULTS—There was no significant improvement between baseline and follow-up in mean HbA1c levels (8.5 vs. 8.6% in men, 9.3 vs. 8.7% in women). The proportion of individuals with serious complications (preproliferative or laser-treated retinopathy, proteinuria or more severe renal disease, peripheral neuropathy, and autonomic neuropathy) increased from 3–37% during the 11-year period. Women were more likely than men to have multiple complications (23 vs. 6%, difference 17%, 95% CI 4–29%, P = 0.02). Psychiatric disorders increased from 16 to 28% (20% in men, 36% in women at follow-up, difference NS), and 8% had psychiatric disorders at both assessments. Baseline psychiatric symptom scores predicted follow-up scores (β = 0.32, SE [β] 0.12, P = 0.008, 95% CI 0.09–0.56) and recurrent admissions with diabetic ketoacidosis (odds ratio 9.1, 95% CI 2.9–28.6, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS—The clinical and psychiatric outcome in this cohort was poor. Psychiatric symptoms in later adolescence and young adulthood appeared to predict later psychiatric problems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The brief symptom inventory: an introductory report.
Derogatis, L. R., & Melisaratos, N. (1983) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291700048017 · Cited by 6,650
Measurement of neurotic symptoms by self-report questionnaire: validity of the SCL-90R
Peveler, R. C., & Fairburn, C. G. (1990) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291700036576 · Cited by 140 · cited 4×
“Three or more serious complications 0 1 (2) 0 7 (12)”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citation
Cited by
Care of Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes
Silverstein, J., Klingensmith, G., Copeland, K., Plotnick, L., Kaufman, F., Laffel, L., Deeb, L., Grey, M., Anderson, B., Holzmeister, L. A., et al. (2005) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.28.1.186 · Cited by 1,312
Sawicki, G. S., Lukens-Bull, K., Yin, X., Demars, N., Huang, I.-C., Livingood, W., Reiss, J., & Wood, D. (2011) · Journal of Pediatric Psychology · doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsp128 · Cited by 592
Peters, A., Laffel, L., & the American Diabetes Association Transitions Working Group (2011) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc11-1723 · Cited by 581
Diabetes structured self-management education programmes: a narrative review and current innovations
Chatterjee, S., Davies, M. J., Heller, S., Speight, J., Snoek, F. J., & Khunti, K. (2018) · The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/s2213-8587(17)30239-5 · Cited by 372
Zanoni, B. C., & Mayer, K. H. (2014) · AIDS Patient Care and STDs · doi:10.1089/apc.2013.0345 · Cited by 395
Metadata
- Authors
- Bryden, K. S., Dunger, D. B., Mayou, R. A., Peveler, R. C., & Neil, H. A. W.
- Venue
- Diabetes Care
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 2003-04-01
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1052-1057
- ISSN
- 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-5548
- OpenAlex
- W2137515234
- Cited by
- 364
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Poor Prognosis of Young Adults With Type 1 Diabetes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/diacare.26.4.1052
- The paper
- Bryden, K. S., Dunger, D. B., Mayou, R. A., Peveler, R. C., & Neil, H. A. W. (2003). Poor Prognosis of Young Adults With Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes Care. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.26.4.1052
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.