Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 175

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Do Impotent Men With Diabetes Have More Severe Erectile Dysfunction and Worse Quality of Life Than the General Population of Impotent Patients?

Penson, David F., Latini, David M., Lubeck, Deborah P., Wallace, Katrine L., Henning, James M., Lue, Tom F.·2003·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE—Little is known regarding how diabetic men with erectile dysfunction (ED) differ from the general population of impotent men. The primary objective of this study was to compare disease-specific health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and severity of ED in impotent men with and without diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—Validated functional and HRQOL questionnaires (including the International Index of Erectile Function, the Sexual Self-Efficacy Scale, and the Psychological Impact of Erectile Dysfunction scales) were administered to patients in an ED disease registry. Men with ED and a history of diabetes (n = 20) were compared with men with ED and no history of diabetes (n = 90) at baseline and at the 12-month follow-up. RESULTS—Diabetic impotent men reported worse erectile function and intercourse satisfaction at baseline, and ED had a greater impact on their emotional life. Diabetic men with ED had significantly different trends over time in the Erectile Function (P < 0.001), Intercourse Satisfaction (P < 0.013), Sexual Desire (P < 0.016), Overall Satisfaction (P < 0.023), and the Sexual Experience-Psychological Impact domains (P < 0.002). In addition, there was a trend toward a difference over time in the Emotional Life-Psychological Impact domain (P < 0.067). CONCLUSIONS—Impotent men with diabetes present with worse ED than nondiabetic men with ED, resulting in worse disease-specific HRQOL in the diabetic men. Although diabetic patients initially respond well to ED treatment, responses do not appear to be durable over time. Therefore, clinicians must provide longer-term follow-up when treating ED in diabetic patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/diacare.26.4.1093

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Siu SC, Lo SK, Wong KW, Ip KM, Wong YS: Prevalence of and risk factors for erectile dysfunction in Hong Kong diabetic patients. Diabet Med 18:732–738, 2001 · DOI
  2. Fedele D, Bortolotti A, Coscelli C, Santeusanio F, Chatenoud L, Colli E, Lavezzari M, Landoni M, Parazzini F, on behalf of Gruppo Italiano Studio Deficit Erettile nei Diabetici: Erectile dysfunction in type 1 and type 2 diabetics in Italy. Int J Epidemiol 29:524–531, 2000 · DOI
  3. Bacon CG, Hu FB, Giovannucci E, Glasser DB, Mittleman MA, Rimm EB: Association of type and duration of diabetes with erectile dysfunction in a large cohort of men. Diabetes Care 25:1458–1463, 2002 · DOI
  4. Rendell MS, Rajfer J, Wicker PA, Smith MD: Sildenafil for treatment of erectile dysfunction in men with diabetes: a randomized controlled trial: Sildenafil Diabetes Study Group. JAMA 281:421–426, 1999 · DOI
  5. De Berardis G, Franciosi M, Belfiglio M, Di Nardo B, Greenfield S, Kaplan SH, Pellegrini F, Sacco M, Tognoni G, Valentini M, Nicolucci A: Erectile dysfunction and quality of life in type 2 diabetic patients: a serious problem too often overlooked. Diabetes Care 25:284–291, 2002 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Latini DM, Penson DF, Colwell HH, Lubeck DP, Mehta SS, Henning JM, Lue TF: Psychological impact of erectile dysfunction: validation of a new health related quality of life measure for patients with erectile dysfunction. J Urol 168:2086–2091, 2002 · DOI
  7. OLeary MP, Fowler FJ, Lenderking WR, Barber B, Sagnier PP, Guess HA, Barry MJ: A brief male sexual function inventory for urology. Urology 46:697–706, 1995 · DOI
  8. Libman E, Rothenberg I, Fichten CS, Amsel R: The SSES-E: a measure of sexual self-efficacy in erectile functioning. J Sex Marital Ther 11:233–247, 1985 · DOI
  9. Rosen R, Riley A, Wagner G, Osterloh I, Kirkpatrick J, Mishra A: The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF): a multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology 49:822–830, 1997 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Dey J, Shepherd MD: Evaluation and treatment of erectile dysfunction in men with diabetes mellitus. Mayo Clin Proc 77:276–282, 2002 · DOI
  11. Melman A, Gingell JC: The epidemiology and pathophysiology of erectile dysfunction. J Urol 161:5–11, 1999 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Heaton JP, Lording D, Liu SN, Litonjua AD, Guangwei L, Kim SC, Kim JJ, Zhi-Zhou S, Israr D, Niazi D, Rajatanavin R, Suyono S, Benard F, Casey R, Brock G, Belanger A: Intracavernosal alprostadil is effective for the treatment of erectile dysfunction in diabetic men. Int J Impot Res 13:317–321, 2001 · DOI
  13. Litwin MS, Nied RJ, Dhanani N: Health-related quality of life in men with erectile dysfunction. J Gen Intern Med 13:159–166, 1998 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Penson, D. F., Latini, D. M., Lubeck, D. P., Wallace, K. L., Henning, J. M., & Lue, T. F.
Affiliations
  • Section of Urology, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, and the Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
  • Department of Urology, University of California—San Francisco, San Francisco, California
  • TAP Pharmaceutical Products, Inc., Lake Forest, Illinois
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2003-04-01
Volume
26
Issue
4
Pages
1093-1099
ISSN
  • 0149-5992
  • 1935-5548
Cited by
175
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.