Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 138Sexual function and dysfunction studiesUrological Disorders and TreatmentsUrinary Bladder and Prostate Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 86 of the 88 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 134 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Tadalafil in the treatment of erectile dysfunction

Open access
Coward, Robert, Carson, Culley·2008·Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management

Abstract

Tadalafil in the treatment of erectile dysfunction Robert M Coward, Culley C CarsonDivision of Urologic Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USAAbstract: The treatment for erectile dysfunction (ED) was revolutionized with the development of phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors. Tadalafil (Cialis®; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA) is the newest and most versatile PDE5 inhibitor in the clinical armamentarium for the treatment of ED. Its most unique characteristic is its long half-life of 17.5 hours, which lends itself to a longer therapeutic window with on-demand dosing and effective steady-state plasma concentrations with once-daily dosing. Clinical trials have proven its safety and efficacy with both dosing strategies for all severities and etiologies of ED, including difficult-to-treat ED. This thorough review will discuss ED, the physiology of penile erection and the role of PDE5, and all aspects of tadalafil, from its development, through its pharmacology, to its latest clinical studies and indications.Keywords: tadalafil, Cialis, PDE5 inhibitors, phosphodiesterase type 5, erectile dysfunction, penile erection

Overview

CoChat Summary

TL;DR

Tadalafil is a PDE5 inhibitor with a uniquely long half-life (17.5 hours in healthy men; 21.6 hours in elderly men) that is safe and effective for erectile dysfunction (ED) across severities and etiologies, using either on-demand or once-daily dosing. This narrative review summarizes its pharmacology, clinical trial efficacy, safety, drug interactions, and patient/partner preference data.

Key findings

  • In an integrated analysis of 5 randomized trials (1112 men), tadalafil 10 mg and 20 mg increased IIEF-EF scores by 6.5 and 7.9 points versus 0.6 with placebo (p < 0.001); SEP-Q3 successful intercourse improved by 34% and 39% versus 6% with placebo (p < 0.001); GAQ improved erections in 81% with tadalafil 20 mg versus 35% with placebo (p < 0.001).
  • A larger integrated analysis (original 1112 plus 1215 additional men) found IIEF-EF increases of 6.5 (10 mg) and 8.6 (20 mg) versus 0.9 with placebo (p < 0.001); SEP-Q3 success improved by 34% to 58% and 46% to 68% versus 8% to 31% with placebo (p < 0.001); GAQ improved erections in 71% and 84% versus 33% with placebo (p < 0.001).
  • Once-daily tadalafil trials showed efficacy: in 268 men, IIEF-EF improved by 9.7 (5 mg) and 9.4 (10 mg) versus 0.9 with placebo (p < 0.001), with successful intercourse in 67.2% and 72.8% versus 36.7% (p < 0.001); in 287 men over 24 weeks, IIEF-EF improved by 6.0 (2.5 mg) and 7.0 (5 mg) versus 1.2 with placebo (p < 0.001).
  • Tadalafil was preferred over sildenafil in multiple crossover studies: 90.5% of prior sildenafil users switched to tadalafil; 71% chose tadalafil versus 29% sildenafil in a 291-man study (p < 0.001); female partners preferred tadalafil in 79.2% versus 15.6% for sildenafil. Adverse events with tadalafil 20 mg included headache (15%), dyspepsia (8%), and back pain (5%), with 3.2% discontinuing treatment.

Methods

  • Narrative review of tadalafil for ED, covering erectile physiology, PDE5 biology, tadalafil development, pharmacology, safety, drug interactions, efficacy, and patient preference.
  • Data sources are published clinical trials, integrated analyses, randomized controlled trials, open-label extensions, crossover preference studies, and prescribing information; no new primary data are presented.
  • Main analysis is qualitative synthesis of efficacy outcomes (IIEF-EF, SEP-Q2/Q3, GAQ, EDITS), pharmacokinetics, adverse events, and cardiovascular/α-blocker/nitrate interactions.

Limitations

  • Stated in the paper: the 2-year once-daily GAQ data had a significant dropout rate and likely selection bias toward responders; the risks of tadalafil’s longer half-life have yet to be completely elucidated; the clinical significance of PDE11 inhibition is not fully understood; and it remains uncertain whether continuous or on-demand dosing is superior after bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy.
  • Stated in the paper: further basic science and clinical research is needed to define tadalafil’s role in lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia.
  • Evident from the text: as a narrative review, it does not report a systematic search strategy, formal risk-of-bias assessment, or meta-analysis, and it relies on selected published trials and prescribing information rather than independent primary data.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2147/tcrm.s3336

Cites

86 of 86 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 Valid · 0 Not valid · 123 Not checked · 14 Own results and interpretations

85 more claims

Create a free account to see all 137 claims and to verify the 88 references still open.

See all claims — free account
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 41
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 3
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 7

Create a free account to see these claims.

Citations

Cites

Show all 88 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Cappelleri JC Rosen RC Smith MD 1999 Diagnostic evaluation of the erectile function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function Urology 54 346 51 10443736
  2. NIH Consensus Development Panel on Impotence 1993 NIH Consensus Conference: impotence JAMA 270 83 90 8510302

Cited by

See all 138

Metadata

Authors
Coward, R., & Carson, C.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Coward, Robert
Venue
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
Published
2008-12
Volume
Volume 4
Issue
6
Pages
1315-1329
ISSN
  • 1176-6336 (ISSN-L)
  • 1178-203X
OpenAlex
W1901755736
Cited by
138
References
88
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
Eli Lilly and Company
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urological Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
Keywords
tadalafil, erectile dysfunction, phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors, phosphodiesterase 5, once-daily dosing, on-demand dosing, drug safety and efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-14, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-14 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tadalafil in the treatment of erectile dysfunction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2147/tcrm.s3336
The paper
Coward, R., & Carson, C. (2008). Tadalafil in the treatment of erectile dysfunction. Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management. https://doi.org/10.2147/tcrm.s3336

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.