The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Home Monitoring of Foot Skin Temperatures to Prevent Ulceration
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE—To evaluate the effectiveness of at-home infrared temperature monitoring as a preventative tool in individuals at high risk for diabetes-related lower-extremity ulceration and amputation. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—Eighty-five patients who fit diabetic foot risk category 2 or 3 (neuropathy and foot deformity or previous history of ulceration or partial foot amputation) were randomized into a standard therapy group (n = 41) or an enhanced therapy group (n = 44). Standard therapy consisted of therapeutic footwear, diabetic foot education, and regular foot evaluation by a podiatrist. Enhanced therapy included the addition of a handheld infrared skin thermometer to measure temperatures on the sole of the foot in the morning and evening. Elevated temperatures (>4°F compared with the opposite foot) were considered to be “at risk” of ulceration due to inflammation at the site of measurement. When foot temperatures were elevated, subjects were instructed to reduce their activity and contact the study nurse. Study subjects were followed for 6 months. RESULTS—The enhanced therapy group had significantly fewer diabetic foot complications (enhanced therapy group 2% vs. standard therapy group 20%, P = 0.01, odds ratio 10.3, 95% CI 1.2–85.3). There were seven ulcers and two Charcot fractures among standard therapy patients and one ulcer in the enhanced therapy group. CONCLUSIONS—These results suggest that at-home patient self-monitoring with daily foot temperatures may be an effective adjunctive tool to prevent foot complications in individuals at high risk for lower-extremity ulceration and amputation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Diabetic foot ulcers and their recurrence
Armstrong, D. G., Boulton, A. J. M., & Bus, S. A. (2017) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra1615439 · Cited by 4,376
Self-citationBoulton (2008) · doi:10.2337/dc08-9021 · Cited by 928
Diabetic Foot Disorders: A Clinical Practice Guideline (2006 Revision)
Frykberg, R. G., Zgonis, T., Armstrong, D. G., Driver, V. R., Giurini, J. M., Kravitz, S. R., Landsman, A. S., Lavery, L. A., Moore, J. C., Schuberth, J. M., et al. (2006) · The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery · doi:10.1016/s1067-2516(07)60001-5 · Cited by 831
Self-citationSystematic Review of Home Telemonitoring for Chronic Diseases: The Evidence Base
Pare, G., Jaana, M., & Sicotte, C. (2007) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1197/jamia.m2270 · Cited by 816
Guidelines on the prevention of foot ulcers in persons with diabetes (IWGDF 2019 update)
Bus, S. A., Lavery, L. A., Monteiro‐Soares, M., Rasmussen, A., Raspovic, A., Sacco, I. C. N., van Netten, J. J., & on behalf of the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (2020) · Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews · doi:10.1002/dmrr.3269 · Cited by 517
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lavery, L. A., Higgins, K. R., Lanctot, D. R., Constantinides, G. P., Zamorano, R. G., Armstrong, D. G., Athanasiou, K. A., & Agrawal, C. M.
- Venue
- Diabetes Care
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 2004-11-01
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2642-2647
- ISSN
- 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-5548
- OpenAlex
- W2108229254
- Cited by
- 378
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Home Monitoring of Foot Skin Temperatures to Prevent Ulceration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/diacare.27.11.2642
- The paper
- Lavery, L. A., Higgins, K. R., Lanctot, D. R., Constantinides, G. P., Zamorano, R. G., Armstrong, D. G., Athanasiou, K. A., & Agrawal, C. M. (2004). Home Monitoring of Foot Skin Temperatures to Prevent Ulceration. Diabetes Care. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.27.11.2642
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.