The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Improved Glucose Excursions Using an Implantable Real-Time Continuous Glucose Sensor in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE—The capability of emerging glucose sensor technology to continuously monitor glucose levels may provide ways to achieve glycemic targets while reducing hypoglycemia. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—A first-generation, long-term continuous glucose sensor (DexCom, San Diego, CA) was implanted subcutaneously in 15 patients with type 1 diabetes. Safety, efficacy, and potential benefits were evaluated during a blinded control period and in a study period during which patients had real-time access to the glucose data. RESULTS—The bias differences between self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG) and sensor data were <15% at 2.8, 4.4, 5.6, 8.3, and 11.1 mmol/l. No procedure or device-related adverse events were observed. Of 15 patients, 13 (87%) had functional sensors during the 12-h simulated home use study with 96% of points in the A and B regions of the Clarke error grid, an R value of 0.88, and a mean absolute relative difference of 16% when retrospectively compared with SMBG. In actual home use, during the blinded control period (50 ± 16 days) data were not displayed to the patient, whereas during the unblinded study period (44 ± 17 days) the data were presented to the patient, and alerts were set at 3.1, 5.6, and 11.1 mmol/l. Patients spent a median of 47% less time below 3.1 mmol/l (P < 0.05) and 25% less time above 13.3 mmol/l (P < 0.05) during the nonblinded study period compared with the blinded control period. CONCLUSIONS—The availability of real-time continuous glucose values may help patients reduce their hyperglycemic excursions and lower the risk of hypoglycemia.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group (1995) · Diabetes · doi:10.2337/diab.44.8.968 · Cited by 1,301
Cited by
Wearable and flexible electronics for continuous molecular monitoring
Yang, Y., & Gao, W. (2019) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c7cs00730b · Cited by 1,315
Weinzimer, S. A., Steil, G. M., Swan, K. L., Dziura, J., Kurtz, N., & Tamborlane, W. V. (2008) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc07-1967 · Cited by 567
Yoo, H. J., An, H. G., Park, S. Y., Ryu, O. H., Kim, H. Y., Seo, J. A., Hong, E. G., Shin, D. H., Kim, Y. H., Kim, S. G., et al. (2008) · Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2008.06.015 · Cited by 244
Koschwanez, H. E., & Reichert, W. M. (2007) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.03.034 · Cited by 181
Glycemic Characteristics in Continuously Monitored Patients With Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes
Bode, B. W., Schwartz, S., Stubbs, H. A., & Block, J. E. (2005) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.28.10.2361 · Cited by 137
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Garg, S. K., Schwartz, S., & Edelman, S. V.
- Venue
- Diabetes Care
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 2004-03-01
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 734-738
- ISSN
- 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-5548
- OpenAlex
- W2032035801
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improved Glucose Excursions Using an Implantable Real-Time Continuous Glucose Sensor in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/diacare.27.3.734
- The paper
- Garg, S. K., Schwartz, S., & Edelman, S. V. (2004). Improved Glucose Excursions Using an Implantable Real-Time Continuous Glucose Sensor in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes Care. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.27.3.734
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.