Cited by 3Diabetes Treatment and ManagementRetinal Diseases and TreatmentsDiabetes Management and Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

HbA1c Change and Diabetic Retinopathy During GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Cardiovascular Outcome Trials: A Meta-analysis and Meta-regression

Open access

Abstract

Background: Long-term glycemic control reduces retinopathy risk, but transient worsening can occur with glucose control intensification. GLP-1 receptor agonists (RA) lower glucose, but long-term impact on retinopathy is unknown. GLP-1RA cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs) provide long-term follow-up, allowing examination of retinopathy outcomes. Purpose: To examine the associations between retinopathy, HbA1c, systolic blood pressure (SBP) and weight in GLP-1RA CVOTs. Data Sources: Systematic review identified 6 placebo-controlled GLP-1RA CVOTs reporting prespecified retinopathy outcomes. Study Selection: Published trial reports were used as primary data sources. Data Extraction: HbA1c, SBP, and weight data throughout follow-up by treatment group were extracted. Data Synthesis: Random effects model meta-analysis showed no association between GLP-1RA treatment and retinopathy (odds ratio [OR] 1.10; 95% CI 0.93, 1.30), with high heterogeneity between studies (I2=52.2%; Q-statistic p=0.063). Univariate meta-regression showed an association between retinopathy and average HbA1c reduction during the overall follow-up (slope=0.77, p=0.007), but no relationship for SBP or weight. Sensitivity analyses for HbA1c showed a relationship at 3 months (p=0.006) and 1 year (p=0.002). A 0.1% (1.09 mmol/mol) increase in HbA1c reduction was associated with 6%, 14%, or 8% increased ln (OR) for retinopathy at the 3-month, 1-year, and overall follow-up, respectively. Limitations: CVOTs were not powered to assess retinopathy outcomes and differed in retinopathy-related criteria and methodology. The median follow-up of 3.4 years is short compared to the onset of retinopathy. Conclusions: HbA1c reduction was significantly associated with increased retinopathy risk in meta-regression for GLP-1RA CVOTs. The magnitude of HbA1c reduction was correlated with retinopathy risk in people with diabetes and additional cardiovascular risk factors, but the long-term impact of improved glycemic control on retinopathy is unmeasured in these studies. Retinopathy status should be assessed when intensifying glucose-lowering therapy.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/figshare.13100045

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A meta-analysis of six placebo-controlled trials indicated that the worsening of diabetic retinopathy correlated with reductions in average HbA1c rather than with GLP-1 RA treatment.

    “Similarly, a meta-analysis of six placebo-controlled trials indicated that the worsening of diabetic retinopathy correlated with reductions in average HbA1c rather than with GLP-1 RA treatment [92].”

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bethel, M. A., Diaz, R., Castellana, N., Bhattacharya, I., Gerstein, H. C., & Lakshmanan, M. C.
Published
2020-12-21
OpenAlex
W4245225751
Cited by
3
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
GLP-1 receptor agonists, diabetic retinopathy, HbA1c reduction, glycemic control, cardiovascular outcome trials, systolic blood pressure, weight, diabetes mellitus, retinopathy risk

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review