Cited by 61Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer StudiesPhotodynamic Therapy Research StudiesDermatologic Treatments and Research

Cold water and pauses in illumination reduces pain during photodynamic therapy: A randomized clinical study

Open access
Regin Wiegell, Stine, Hædersdal, Merete, Christian Wulf, Hans·2008·Acta Dermato Venereologica

Abstract

Pain is the main acute adverse event during photodynamic therapy of skin lesions. The objective of this randomized study was to evaluate the pain-relieving effect of pauses and cooling during illumination. Twenty-four patients with actinic keratoses were treated with photodynamic therapy in two symmetrical areas and cooled with either cold-water-spray or cold-water-pack (CoolPack). Treatment areas were cooled during either the first or second period of illumination, which were separated by a 3-min pause in illumination. Pain intensity was scored from 0 to 10. Water-spray reduced the mean pain score by 1.2 points (p=0.030) and CoolPack by 1.3 points (p=0.007) during the first half of the illumination. Pain intensity decreased during the pause by 3.7 points in water-spray patients (p<0.0001) and 3.0 points in CoolPack patients (p<0.0001). In conclusion, cooling resulted in a minor reduction in pain intensity, while adding the intermediate pause in illumination reduced the pain considerably. Use of pauses and cooling during illumination is an easy and inexpensive way to make photodynamic therapy more tolerable for the patient.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2340/00015555-0568

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cooling and pauses during PDT, in combination, were effective in achieving a considerable reduction in pain.

    “Cooling and pauses during PDT, in combination, were effective in achieving a considerable reduction in pain [35].”

    From Photodynamic Therapy for Non-Melanoma Skin Cancers (2016) · cites this paper as [35]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Regin Wiegell, S., Hædersdal, M., & Christian Wulf, H.
Venue
Acta Dermato Venereologica
Published
2008-11-26
Volume
89
Issue
2
Pages
145-149
ISSN
  • 0001-5555 (ISSN-L)
  • 1651-2057
OpenAlex
W2412345166
Cited by
61
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Acta Dermato Venereologica (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Photodynamic Therapy Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatologic Treatments and Research
Keywords
photodynamic therapy, pain, actinic keratosis, treatment tolerability, adverse events
MeSH terms
Aged, Cold Temperature, Female, Fluorescence, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain, Pain Measurement, Photochemotherapy, Protoporphyrins, Skin Temperature, Photosensitizing Agents, Keratosis, Actinic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review