Cited by 37Stroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryBalance, Gait, and Falls PreventionPhysical Activity and Health

Accelerometric assessment of different dimensions of natural walking during the first year after stroke: Recovery of amount, distribution, quality and speed of walking

Open access
Sánchez, M, Bussmann, J, Janssen, W, Horemans, H, Chastin, S, Heijenbrok, M, Stam, H·2015·Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To describe the course of walking behaviour over a period of 1 year after stroke, using accelerometry, and to compare 1-year data with those from a healthy group. DESIGN: One-year follow-up cohort study. SUBJECTS: Twenty-three stroke patients and 20 age-matched healthy subjects. METHODS: Accelerometer assessments were made in the participants' daily environment for 8 h/day during the 1st (T1), 12th (T2) and 48th (T3) weeks after stroke, and at one time-point in healthy subjects. Primary outcomes were: percentage of time walking and upright (amount); mean duration and number of walking periods (distribution); step regularity and gait symmetry (quality); and walking speed. RESULTS: Time walking, time upright, and number of walking bouts increased during T1 and T2 (p < 0.01) and then levelled off (p > 0.30). Mean duration of walking periods showed no significant improvements (p > 0.30) during all phases. Step regularity, gait symmetry and gait speed showed a tendency to increase consistently from T1 to T3. At T3, amount and distribution variables reached the level of the healthy group, but significant differences remained (p < 0.02) in step regularity and gait speed. CONCLUSION: In this cohort, different outcomes of walking behaviour showed different patterns and levels of recovery, which supports the multi-dimensional character of gait.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2340/16501977-1994

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [5]5. Manns PJ, Baldwin E. Ambulatory activity of stroke survivors: measurement options for dose, intensity, and variability of activity. Stroke 2009; 40: 864-867.
  2. [11]11. Prajapati SK, Gage WH, Brooks D, Black SE, McIlroy WE. A novel approach to ambulatory monitoring: investigation into the quantity and control of everyday walking in patients with subacute stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2011; 25: 6-14.
  3. [12]12. Shaughnessy M, Michael KM, Sorkin JD, Macko RF. Steps after stroke: capturing ambulatory recovery. Stroke 2005; 36: 1305-1307.
  4. [26]26. Bussmann JBJ. Feasibility of ambulatory measurement of prosthetic gait in the early phase of rehabilitation. Ambulatory monitoring of mobility-related activities in rehabilitation medicine [PhD thesis]. Eburon: Delft, The Netherlands; 2008, p. 171-189.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sánchez, M., Bussmann, J., Janssen, W., Horemans, H., Chastin, S., Heijenbrok, M., & Stam, H.
Affiliations
  • Universidad de Sevilla (ES)
  • Erasmus MC (NL)
  • Glasgow Caledonian University (GB)
Corresponding author
Sánchez, M
Venue
Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
Published
2015
Volume
47
Issue
8
Pages
714-721
ISSN
1650-1977 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2415109850
Cited by
37
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3
FWCI
4.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchOnline (acceptedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • ResearchOnline (Glasgow Caledonian University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
stroke, walking behavior, gait recovery, accelerometry, gait symmetry, walking speed, walking bouts, gait quality, stroke rehabilitation
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Cohort Studies, Walking, Stroke, Accelerometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review