The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Medical Image Segmentation based on U-Net: A Review
Abstract
Medical image analysis is performed by analyzing images obtained by medical imaging systems to solve clinical problems. The purpose is to extract effective information and improve the level of clinical diagnosis. In recent years, automatic segmentation based on deep learning (DL) methods has been widely used, where a neural network can automatically learn image features, which is in sharp contrast with the traditional manual learning method. U-net is one of the most important semantic segmentation frameworks for a convolutional neural network (CNN). It is widely used in the medical image analysis domain for lesion segmentation, anatomical segmentation, and classification. The advantage of this network framework is that it can not only accurately segment the desired feature target and effectively process and objectively evaluate medical images but also help to improve accuracy in the diagnosis by medical images. Therefore, this article presents a literature review of medical image segmentation based on U-net, focusing on the successful segmentation experience of U-net for different lesion regions in six medical imaging systems. Along with the latest advances in DL, this article introduces the method of combining the original U-net architecture with deep learning and a method for improving the U-net network.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
Cited by
Exploring Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 diversity for flood inundation mapping using deep learning
Konapala, G., Kumar, S. V., & Khalique Ahmad, S. (2021) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2021.08.016 · Cited by 209
Kang, H., Witanto, J. N., Pratama, K., Lee, D., Choi, K. S., Choi, S. H., Kim, K., Kim, M., Kim, J. W., Kim, Y. H., et al. (2023) · Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1002/jmri.28332 · Cited by 40
Wang, X., Bao, N., Xin, X., Tan, J., Li, H., Zhou, S., & Liu, H. (2022) · Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery · doi:10.21037/qims-21-1155 · Cited by 20
Szentimrey, Z., Ameri, G., Hong, C. X., Cheung, R. Y. K., Ukwatta, E., & Eltahawi, A. (2023) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1002/mp.16389 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Du, G., Cao, X., Liang, J., Chen, X., & Zhan, Y.
- Venue
- Journal of Imaging Science and Technology
- Published
- 2020-03-01
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 020508-1-020508-12
- ISSN
- 1062-3701 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-3522
- OpenAlex
- W3011743383
- Cited by
- 572
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 20.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Medical Image Segmentation based on U-Net: A Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2352/j.imagingsci.technol.2020.64.2.020508
- The paper
- Du, G., Cao, X., Liang, J., Chen, X., & Zhan, Y. (2020). Medical Image Segmentation based on U-Net: A Review. Journal of Imaging Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.2352/j.imagingsci.technol.2020.64.2.020508
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.