Cited by 9Industrial Vision Systems and Defect DetectionFace and Expression RecognitionNon-Destructive Testing Techniques

Learning a Class-specific and Shared Dictionary for Classifying Surface Defects of Steel Sheet

Open access
Zhou, Shiyang, Chen, Youping, Zhang, Dailin, Xie, Jingming, Zhou, Yunfei·2017·ISIJ International

Abstract

An approach to a class-specific and shared dictionary learning (CDSDL) for sparse representation is proposed to classify surface defects of steel sheet. The proposed CDSDL algorithm is modelled as a unified objective function, covering reconstructive error, sparse and discriminative promotion constraints. With the high-quality dictionary, the compact, reconstructive and discriminative feature representation of an image can be extracted. Then the classification can be efficiently performed by discriminative information obtained from the reconstructive error or the sparse vector. Based on a dataset of surface images captured from a practical steel production line, the CDSDL algorithm is carried out to verify its effectiveness. Experimental results indicate that the CDSDL algorithm is more effective in classifying surface defects of steel sheet than other algorithms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2355/isijinternational.isijint-2016-478

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Testing results prove that Zhou et al.'s scheme improved classification performance efficiently due to discriminative information obtained from the reconstructive error or the sparse vector.

    “Testing results prove that this scheme has improved the classification performance efficiently due to the discriminative information obtained from the reconstructive error or the sparse vector.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhou, S., Chen, Y., Zhang, D., Xie, J., & Zhou, Y.
Affiliations
Huazhong University of Science and Technology (CN)
Venue
ISIJ International
Published
2017
Volume
57
Issue
1
Pages
123-130
ISSN
  • 0915-1559 (ISSN-L)
  • 1347-5460
OpenAlex
W2552846726
Cited by
9
References
8
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
ISIJ International (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (51174151)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face and Expression Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
Keywords
dictionary learning, sparse representation, surface defect classification, steel sheet, discriminative representations, industrial inspection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review