Cited by 34Industrial Vision Systems and Defect DetectionImage Retrieval and Classification TechniquesNon-Destructive Testing Techniques

Invariant Feature Extraction Method Based on Smoothed Local Binary Pattern for Strip Steel Surface Defect

Open access
Chu, Maoxiang, Gong, Rongfen·2015·ISIJ International

Abstract

An invariant feature extraction method based on smoothed local binary pattern (SLBP) is proposed for strip steel surface defect images. SLBP proposed in this paper is a developed version of local binary pattern (LBP). It is determined by the sign of the difference between weighted grays in local neighborhood. SLBP has the ability of noise smoothing. In this paper, invariant features are obtained by concentric discrete square sampling template (CDSST). Firstly, defect images are resampled on CDSST by the way of coordinate mapping. Then, invariant features in scale, rotation, illumination and translation are extracted by combining two types of SLBP images and gray-level co-occurrence matrix. Experimental results show that this novel feature extraction method not only can extract features with scale, rotation, illumination and translation invariance, but also can effectively suppress noise and maintain high classification accuracy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2355/isijinternational.isijint-2015-201

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. [1]1. G. F. Wu, K. Xu and C. L. Yang: On-line Monitoring Technology for Steel Plate Surface Quality, Science Press, Beijing, (2010), 136 (in Chinese).
  2. [2]2. R. M. Haralick, K. Shanmugam and I. Dinstein: IEEE Trans. Syst., Man Cybern., SMC-3 (1973), 610.
  3. [3]3. Y. Hu, C. X. Zhao and H. N. Wang: Proc. Pacific-Asia Workshop on Computational Intelligence and Industrial Application, Vol. 2, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, (2008), 277.
  4. [4]4. M. K. Hu: IRE Trans. Inform. Theory, 8 (1962), 179.
  5. [5]5. T. Ojala, M. PietikÄainen and D. Harwood: Pattern Recognit., 29 (1996), 51.
  6. [6]6. T. Ojala, M. PietikÄainen and T. MÄaenpÄaÄa: IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal., 24 (2002), 971.
  7. [7]7. A. Hafiane, G. Seetharaman and B. Zavidovique: Proc. Int. Conf. on Image Analysis and Recognition, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, (2007), 387.
  8. [8]8. S. Liao and A. C. S. Chung: Proc. 8th Asian Conf. on Computer Vision, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, (2007), 672.
  9. [9]9. A. Petpon and S. Srisuk: Proc. 5th Int. Conf. on Image and Graphics, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, (2010), 533.
  10. [10]10. M. HeikkilÄa, M. PietikÄainen and C. Schmid: Pattern Recognit., 42 (2009), 425.
  11. [11]11. M. Pietikainen, T. Ojala and Z. Xu: Pattern Recognit., 33 (2000), 43.
  12. [12]12. M. X. Chu, A. N. Wang, R. F. Gong and M. Sha: ISIJ Int., 54 (2014), 1638.
  13. [13]13. C. H. Lin, J. S. Tsai and C. T. Chiu: IEEE Trans. Image Process., 19 (2010), 2307.
  14. [14]14. S. Wang: Proc. 11th Int. Conf. on Computer and Information Tech- nology, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, (2011), 277.
  15. [15]15. M. Tabb and N. Ahuja: IEEE Trans. Image Process., 6 (1997), 642.
  16. [16]16. Jayadeva, R. Khemchandani and S. Chandra: IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal., 29 (2007), 905.
  17. [17]17. M. X. Chu, R. F. Gong and A. N. Wang: ISIJ Int., 54 (2014), 119.
  18. [18]18. E. Y. Hu, H. Wang, J. H. Wang, S. Lu and L. Tian: Proc. Int. Conf. on Computer Science and Automation Engineering, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, (2011), 388.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chu, M., & Gong, R.
Affiliations
University of Science and Technology Liaoning (CN)
Venue
ISIJ International
Published
2015
Volume
55
Issue
9
Pages
1956-1962
ISSN
  • 0915-1559 (ISSN-L)
  • 1347-5460
OpenAlex
W2181150946
Cited by
34
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2
FWCI
2.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ISIJ International (publishedVersion)
  • Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
University of Science and Technology Liaoning
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
Keywords
local binary pattern, invariant feature extraction, gray level co-occurrence matrix, scale invariance, rotation invariance, illumination invariance, translation invariance, noise reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review