Supplementary materials to: Mindfulness-based interventions for men with prostate cancer.
Open accessAbstract
The review entailed a systematic literature search, data extraction, quality appraisal, and data synthesis via a quantitative approach. Review findings were reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA). The review protocol was registered in the PROSPERO systematic review register (CRD42020207788). Bibliographic search in Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science Core Collection, MEDLINE, PsycINFO and PsycArticles was carried out from inception up to 7th November 2020. The study selection process was presented using the four-phase item PRISMA flow chat with characteristics of included and excluded studies. The Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) risk of bias tool and the National Institute of Health (NIH) quality assessment tool for before-after (pre-post) studies was employed for quality assessment. Studies with similar outcome measure were pooled together in a meta-analysis using STATA statistical software.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Such approach has also been recommended for a more generalisable randomised trials where certain covariates exist by chance.
“Such approach has also been recommended for a more generalisable randomised trials where certain covariates exist by chance.52,53”
From Mindfulness-based interventions for psychological wellbeing and quality of life in men with prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2021) · cites this paper as [53]
The available copy is a PsychArchives listing for supplementary materials, with no section or page discussing trial methods. Searches for the quoted recommendation and for covariate imbalance in randomised trials returned only the listing, so the claim cannot be verified from this copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Nnate, D. A., Anyachukwu, C. C., Igwe, S. E., & Abaraogu, U. O. (2021) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.5749 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Nnate, D. A., & Abaraogu, U. O.
- Venue
- Leibniz Institute for Psychology (ZPID)
- Publisher
- Leibniz Institute for Psychology (ZPID)
- Published
- 2021-04-09
- OpenAlex
- W3153087364
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2021: 1
- Type
- supplementary materials
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- Locations
- Psychology Archives (cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
- Keywords
- mindfulness-based interventions, prostate cancer, men, cancer patients, psychological intervention
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
