Oxygen uptake and respiratory exchange ratio relative to the lactate threshold running in well-trained distance runners
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study compared oxygen uptake (V̇O2) and the respiratory exchange ratio (RER) between well-trained distance runners (DRs) and recreational runners (RRs) below, at, and above the lactate threshold (LT) during a four-minute run and clarified whether these variables reached steady state in DRs. METHODS: Ten male well-trained DRs (maximal oxygen uptake [V̇O2max], 66.8±5.9 mL/kg/min; LT, 80.0±4.4% V̇O2max) and nine male RRs (V̇O2max, 53.9±3.7 mL/kg/min; LT, 76.6±8.0% V̇O2max) participated in this study. They performed four-minute runs at 70%, 80%, and 90% V̇O2max on a treadmill. RESULTS: The results illustrated that V̇O2 was higher in the fourth minute than in the third minute in RRs at 80% and 90% V̇O2max (Cohen's d=0.25 and 0.26, respectively), whereas, V̇O2 did not differ between the third and fourth minute in DRs at any intensity (Cohen's d=0.08, 0.03, and 0.04, respectively). The RER at each intensity differed between the third and fourth minutes in RRs (Cohen's d=0.25, 0.21, and 0.41, respectively); similarly, RER was only different between the third and fourth minutes at 90%V̇O2max (Cohen's d=0.39) in DRs. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that the slow component of V̇O2 is not observed in runners with good aerobic capacity even at running intensity exceeding the LT, whereas the RER does not reach steady state at this intensity.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Improvements in ventilatory thresholds above the second ventilatory threshold were only observed in well-trained endurance runners.
“However, improvements in ventilatory thresholds above the second ventilatory improvements were only observed in well-trained endurance runners (Seiler et al., 2007; Tanji and Nabekura, 2019).”
From High-Intensity Interval Training and Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training Affect Running Economy in Endurance Runners: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials (2025) · cites this paper as Tanji and Nabekura, 2019
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Feng, Y., Li, D., Liu, Y., & Tang, D. (2025) · Journal of Human Kinetics · doi:10.5114/jhk/205427 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“However, improvements in ventilatory thresholds above the second ventilatory improvements were only observed in well ‐ trained endurance runners (Seiler et al., 2007; Tanji and Nabekura, 2019).”
- Authors
- Tanji, F., & Nabekura, Y.
- Affiliations
- University of Tsukuba (JP)
- Venue
- The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness
- Publisher
- Edizioni Minerva Medica
- Published
- 2019-06
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 895-901
- ISSN
- 0022-4707 (ISSN-L)
- 1827-1928
- OpenAlex
- W2951025148
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 0.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (17H07403)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
- Keywords
- oxygen consumption, respiratory exchange ratio, lactate threshold, slow component of oxygen uptake, steady state, long-distance runners, recreational runners, cardiorespiratory fitness, running intensity, endurance running
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Exercise Test, Humans, Male, Oxygen Consumption, Running, Case-Control Studies, Exercise Tolerance, Lactic Acid, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review