Cited by 26Pelvic floor disorders treatmentsUterine Myomas and TreatmentsHernia repair and management

Histologic and metabolic assessment in a cohort of patients with genital prolapse: preoperative stage and recurrence investigations

Manodoro, Stefano, Spelzini, Federico, Cesana, Maria C., Frigerio, Matteo, Maggioni, Daniele, Ceresa, Cecilia, Penati, Cristina, Sicuri, Martina +3 more·2017·Minerva Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Biological basis of prolapse development and recurrence are still unclear. Aim of this observational and prospective study is to correlate clinical stage of anterior vaginal wall prolapse and anatomical recurrence to histological and metabolic characteristics of vaginal tissue. METHODS: Patients undergoing surgery were divided into two groups according to anterior stage ≤II (group A) and ≥III (group B). Full-thickness excisional biopsies of the anterior vaginal wall were obtained after hysterectomy. Hystological characteristics and metalloproteinases activity (MMP-2) were analyzed. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients (35 group A; 34 group B) completed evaluation. Mean follow-up was 35 months. Collagen amount and organization were significantly higher in group B both in lamina propria and fascia specimens, but MMP-2 activity was significantly lower in this group. Recurrence rate of anterior compartment was 10.1%. Collagen cellularity of fascia was higher in recurrence groups. On the contrary MMP-2 activity showed a close to significant correlation to surgical success (P=0.07). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with advanced stages of prolapse have increased collagen amount associated to decreased MMP-2 activity. This suggests that connective tissue is more abundant but less metabolically active in patients with severe prolapse. A similar trend can be found in recurrences.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.23736/s0026-4784.16.03977-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Manodoro, S., Spelzini, F., Cesana, M. C., Frigerio, M., Maggioni, D., Ceresa, C., Penati, C., Sicuri, M., Fruscio, R., Nicolini, G., & Milani, R.
Affiliations
  • Azienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo (IT)
  • Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale della Valtellina e Alto Lario (IT)
  • University of Milano-Bicocca (IT)
Venue
Minerva Obstetrics and Gynecology
Published
2017-04
Volume
69
Issue
3
Pages
233-238
ISSN
  • 0026-4784 (ISSN-L)
  • 2724-606X
  • 2724-6450
OpenAlex
W2550400930
Cited by
26
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2
FWCI
2.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Minerva Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Uterine Myomas and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hernia repair and management
Keywords
pelvic organ prolapse, cystocele, prolapse recurrence, clinical stage, collagen, MMP-2, connective tissue metabolism, fascia, lamina propria, hysterectomy, surgical success
MeSH terms
Aged, Collagen, Connective Tissue, Fascia, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Hysterectomy, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Recurrence, Uterine Prolapse, Vagina, Matrix Metalloproteinase 2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review