Cited by 16Respiratory Support and MechanismsAbdominal Surgery and ComplicationsHemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Respiratory consequences of intra-abdominal hypertension

Abstract

Intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) is a common complication in critically ill patients that may lead to multiorgan failure and is associated to worse outcome. Respiratory failure is among the most important consequences of IAH and it is originated by different mechanisms, such as chest wall elastance increase, functional residual capacity reduction, compression atelectasis and lung edema formation through reduction in lymphatic drainage. Many experimental studies showed that total lung capacity and functional residual capacity can be decreased by 40% during abdominal hypertension, while respiratory system and chest wall pressure-volume curves can be significantly shifted downward and to the right. Moreover, the relationship between intra-abdominal volume and airway pressure has been found to be exponential, meaning that small increases in volume can translate in dramatic increases in pressure. Clinical studies confirmed relevant atelectasis in dependent lung regions during IAH, with significant reductions in functional residual capacity and compromised oxygenation. Moreover, sepsis-related capillary leak and fluid overload may aggravate IAH and respiratory failure, thus establishing a dangerous vicious circle. Respiratory management of patients with IAH is challenging and there is no univocal answer. The measurement of intra-abdominal pressure and esophageal pressure (as a surrogate of pleural pressure) may be useful in assessing the condition and guiding mechanical ventilation. Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) must be carefully selected to counteract IAH-related diaphragm displacement, but too high PEEP levels are associated with hemodynamic failure. Continuous negative extra-abdominal pressure is a promising approach, but its clinical application needs more investigation.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.23736/s0375-9393.20.14325-6

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 0 references

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. 10.1007/s00134-006-0349-5 · DOI
  2. 10.1179/acb.2007.62.s1.011 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.bpa.2013.06.009 · DOI
  4. 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003623 · DOI
  5. 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003122 · DOI
  6. 10.1152/jappl.1997.82.3.811 · DOI
  7. 10.1378/chest.109.1.144 · DOI
  8. 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2011.02415.x · DOI
  9. 10.1007/s00134-009-1445-0 · DOI
  10. 10.1007/s00134-013-2906-z · DOI
  11. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31817c7a4d · DOI
  12. 10.1186/2110-5820-2-S1-S15 · DOI
  13. 10.1164/ajrccm.156.4.97-01052 · DOI
  14. 10.1152/jappl.1991.70.6.2611 · DOI
  15. 10.1186/s13613-019-0522-y · DOI
  16. 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2002.460513.x · DOI
  17. 10.1093/bja/aeq211 · DOI
  18. 10.1164/rccm.200209-1060OC · DOI
  19. 10.1186/cc11840 · DOI
  20. 10.1179/acb.2007.62.s1.020 · DOI
  21. 10.1155/2012/763181 · DOI
  22. 10.1186/s40635-017-0124-7 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.resp.2011.11.007 · DOI
  24. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000242158.28619.09 · DOI
  25. 10.1097/00000542-200502000-00009 · DOI
  26. 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002638 · DOI
  27. 10.1186/2110-5820-2-S1-S1 · DOI
  28. 10.1007/s00134-007-0592-4 · DOI
  29. 10.1007/s00134-003-2107-2 · DOI
  30. 10.1007/s00134-016-4400-x · DOI
  31. 10.1164/rccm.201312-2193CI · DOI
  32. 10.1097/MCC.0b013e3283427213 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.11.013 · DOI
  34. 10.1186/cc9095 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.10.012 · DOI
  36. 10.1186/cc8118 · DOI
  37. 10.1186/cc9099 · DOI
  38. 10.1097/00005373-199906000-00005 · DOI
  39. 10.1007/s00134-004-2483-2 · DOI
  40. 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002236 · DOI
  41. 10.1007/s00134-003-2013-7 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Tonetti, T., Cavalli, I., Ranieri, V. M., & Mascia, L.
Affiliations
  • IRCCS Azienda Ospedliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico di Sant'Orsola (IT)
  • University of Bologna (IT)
Venue
Minerva Anestesiologica
Published
2020-07
Volume
86
Issue
8
Pages
877-883
ISSN
  • 0375-9393 (ISSN-L)
  • 1827-1596
OpenAlex
W3023194375
Cited by
16
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Minerva Anestesiologica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
  • AIRUS (submittedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Bari Aldo Moro) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Abdominal Surgery and Complications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
Keywords
intra-abdominal hypertension, respiratory failure, atelectasis, functional residual capacity, chest wall elastance, pulmonary edema, lymphatic drainage, pressure-volume relationship, intra-abdominal pressure, esophageal pressure, positive end-expiratory pressure, diaphragm displacement, capillary leak syndrome, fluid overload, mechanical ventilation, critically ill patients
MeSH terms
Humans, Positive-Pressure Respiration, Respiration, Artificial, Respiratory Insufficiency, Acute Lung Injury, Intra-Abdominal Hypertension

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review