Effectiveness of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
Abstract
Background Weight loss and dysphagia are frequent features of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and influence prognosis. The aim of this study was to determine complications and outcomes in patients with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) insertion in a high-volume center. Methods A single center retrospective study on a prospectively collected cohort of 187 consecutive patients who have undergone PEG placement due to ALS was performed. Demographic and clinical parameters were analyzed. Results There were 51.3% male; mean age at insertion was 65.7 years. Major complications occurred in 5 (2.7%) patients: 3 with local infections requiring intravenous antibiotic treatment, 1 patient with PEG dislocation required laparotomy and a new surgically introduced gastrostomy and 1 patient with buried-bumper syndrome. Improvement in Body Mass Index (BMI) and serum albumin levels were recorded in 37.3% and 51.9%, respectively. Mortality after 30 days, 6 months and 12 months was 5.3%, 38% and 64.3%, respectively. At the time of data collection, 78.9% of the patients had died. Mean survival after ALS diagnosis was 20.5 months. Conclusions PEG placement is as an effective, safe nutritional method with a low complication rate in patients with ALS, with or without non-invasive ventilation. The BMI and albumin levels stabilize after PEG placement, indicating benefits of early placement.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Multiple studies have characterized swallowing impairment in ALS and emphasize the importance of early recognition and multidisciplinary management.
“Multiple studies have characterized swallowing impairment in ALS and emphasize the importance of early recognition and multidisciplinary management (Chapin et al., 2020; Elbe et al., 2020; Toepfer et al., 1999; Toepfer et al., 1997).”
From Autonomic nervous system and gastrointestinal manifestations with an emphasis on gastric dysfunction (2026) · cites this paper as Elbe et al., 2020
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 39 · Cited by 10
- Authors
- Elbe, P., Markus, K., Valente, R., Ingre, C., Tsolakis, A. V., & Vujasinovic, M.
- Affiliations
- Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
- Karolinska Institutet (SE)
- Venue
- Minerva Gastroenterologica e Dietologica
- Publisher
- Edizioni Minerva Medica
- Published
- 2020-07
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 219-224
- ISSN
- 1121-421X (ISSN-L)
- 1827-1642
- OpenAlex
- W3046261726
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4
- FWCI
- 0.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Minerva Gastroenterologica e Dietologica (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Dysphagia Assessment and Management
- Keywords
- percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, dysphagia, weight loss, nutritional support, PEG complications, buried bumper syndrome, body mass index, serum albumin, mortality, survival, non-invasive ventilation
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Deglutition Disorders, Female, Gastroscopy, Gastrostomy, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nutritional Status, Retrospective Studies, Weight Loss, Treatment Outcome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review