Cited by 10Clinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ResearchDysphagia Assessment and Management

Effectiveness of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

Elbe, Peter, Markus, Katarina, Valente, Roberto, Ingre, Caroline, Tsolakis, Apostolos V., Vujasinovic, Miroslav·2020·Minerva Gastroenterologica e Dietologica

Abstract

Background Weight loss and dysphagia are frequent features of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and influence prognosis. The aim of this study was to determine complications and outcomes in patients with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) insertion in a high-volume center. Methods A single center retrospective study on a prospectively collected cohort of 187 consecutive patients who have undergone PEG placement due to ALS was performed. Demographic and clinical parameters were analyzed. Results There were 51.3% male; mean age at insertion was 65.7 years. Major complications occurred in 5 (2.7%) patients: 3 with local infections requiring intravenous antibiotic treatment, 1 patient with PEG dislocation required laparotomy and a new surgically introduced gastrostomy and 1 patient with buried-bumper syndrome. Improvement in Body Mass Index (BMI) and serum albumin levels were recorded in 37.3% and 51.9%, respectively. Mortality after 30 days, 6 months and 12 months was 5.3%, 38% and 64.3%, respectively. At the time of data collection, 78.9% of the patients had died. Mean survival after ALS diagnosis was 20.5 months. Conclusions PEG placement is as an effective, safe nutritional method with a low complication rate in patients with ALS, with or without non-invasive ventilation. The BMI and albumin levels stabilize after PEG placement, indicating benefits of early placement.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.23736/s1121-421x.20.02695-1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Multiple studies have characterized swallowing impairment in ALS and emphasize the importance of early recognition and multidisciplinary management.

    “Multiple studies have characterized swallowing impairment in ALS and emphasize the importance of early recognition and multidisciplinary management (Chapin et al., 2020; Elbe et al., 2020; Toepfer et al., 1999; Toepfer et al., 1997).”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 39 · Cited by 10

Authors
Elbe, P., Markus, K., Valente, R., Ingre, C., Tsolakis, A. V., & Vujasinovic, M.
Affiliations
  • Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Venue
Minerva Gastroenterologica e Dietologica
Published
2020-07
Volume
66
Issue
3
Pages
219-224
ISSN
  • 1121-421X (ISSN-L)
  • 1827-1642
OpenAlex
W3046261726
Cited by
10
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4
FWCI
0.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Minerva Gastroenterologica e Dietologica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Dysphagia Assessment and Management
Keywords
percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, dysphagia, weight loss, nutritional support, PEG complications, buried bumper syndrome, body mass index, serum albumin, mortality, survival, non-invasive ventilation
MeSH terms
Aged, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Deglutition Disorders, Female, Gastroscopy, Gastrostomy, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nutritional Status, Retrospective Studies, Weight Loss, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review