Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 12

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Implementation of Inclusive Educational Policies in Elementary School

Zakiah, Winda Greatta, Karsidi, Ravik, Yusuf, Munawir·2021·Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran
DOI 10.23887/jpp.v54i1.32210
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The inclusive education policies were created for children with special needs based on the equality principle. The implementation of inclusive education policies in each region has a different level of success. This research aims to find out how the implementation of inclusive education policies in elementary schools of Surakarta was reviewed from Grindle’s policy implementation theory. The method used in this research is a mixed-methods, which is involving 102 respondents and 9 informants from 12 inclusive schools. The data analysis used in this research was a descriptive statistic and interactive modeling analysis of Miles and Huberman. The results showed that the implementation of inclusive education policy had a positive impact on the students and their environment, with the level of implementation of inclusive education is 76.8%, therefore the efforts are needed to optimize the implementation of inclusive education policies in the form of training for teachers and providing of supporting infrastructures.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.23887/jpp.v54i1.32210

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Amka. (2019). Pendidikan Inklusif Bagi Siswa Berkebutuhan Khusus di Kalimantan Selatan. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 4(1), 86-101. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v4i1.1234. · DOI
  2. Galaterou, J., & A., A. (2017). Teachers' Attitudes towards Inclusive Education: The Role of Job Stessors and Demographic Parameters. International Journal of Special Education, 32(4). Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1184123.
  3. Wardah, E. Y. (2019). Peranan Guru Pembimbing Khusus Lulusan Non-Pendidikan Luar Biasa (PLB) Terhadap Pelayanan Anak Berkebutuhan Khusus di Sekolah Inklusif Kabupaten Lumajang. Jurnal Pendidikan Inklusif, 2(2), 93-108.

Cited by

See all 12

Metadata

Authors
Zakiah, W. G., Karsidi, R., & Yusuf, M.
Venue
Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran
Publisher
Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
Published
2021-03-17
Volume
54
Issue
1
Pages
130
ISSN
  • 2549-2608
  • 2301-7821
DOI
10.23887/jpp.v54i1.32210
Cited by
12
References
29

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.