A Comparison of Teacher-Centered and Student-Centered Approaches in Educational Settings
Open accessAbstract
Student-centered instruction in the classroom has recently challenged teacher-centeredness for allowing students to construct their understandings using their experiences and actions. Student-centered pedagogy is based on constructivist and democratic principles. That students make sense of what they learn in a classroom environment in which they are stimulated to develop their reflective and critical thinking and sense of responsibility come to the fore in student-centered pedagogy. Teacher-centered instruction on the other hand relied heavily on the behaviorist theory which was based on the idea that behavior changes are caused by external stimuli. Compared with student-centered classroom, students in teacher-centered classroom are passive and respond to environmental stimuli. Teacher has the ultimate authority and is in charge of learning for that reason students do not have adequate opportunities to develop their critical thinking and problem solving skills. This article endeavors to compare student-centered and teachercentered approaches and documents their general features in the classroom.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Murphy, L., Eduljee, N. B., & Croteau, K. (2021) · Journal of Effective Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.36021/jethe.v4i1.156 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Mohammadi, R. R., Saeidi, M., & Abdollahi, A. (2023) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2023.103120 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Di Paolo, L. D., White, B., Guénin-Carlut, A., Constant, A., & Clark, A. (2024) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2023.0148 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
- Authors
- Serin, H.
- Corresponding author
- Hamdi Serin
- ORCID
- Hamdi Serin
- Venue
- International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies
- Publisher
- Tishk International University
- Published
- 2018
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2409-1294 (ISSN-L)
- 2520-0968
- OpenAlex
- W3133062954
- Cited by
- 146
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 19.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc
- Locations
- International Journal of Social Sciences and Educational Studies (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Leadership and Administration
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Keywords
- student-centered instruction, teacher-centered instruction, constructivism, behaviorism, critical thinking, reflective thinking, student responsibility, democratic pedagogy, problem-solving skills
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review