Cited by 9Reinforcement Learning in RoboticsAdvanced Control Systems OptimizationAdaptive Dynamic Programming Control

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Continuous Control of Complex Chemical Reaction Network with Reinforcement Learning

Alhazmi, Khalid, Sarathy, S. Mani·2020·2020 European Control Conference (ECC)

Abstract

The goal of process control is to maintain a process at the desired operating conditions. Disturbances, measurement uncertainties, and high-order dynamics in complex and highly integrated chemical processes pose a challenging control problem. Even though advanced process controllers, such as Model Predictive Control (MPC), have been successfully implemented to solve hard control problems, they are difficult to develop, rely on a process model, and require high performance computers and continuous maintenance. Reinforcement learning presents an appealing option for such complex systems, but little work has been done to apply reinforcement learning in chemical reactions with practical significance, to discuss the structure of the RL agent, and to evaluate the performance against benchmark measures. This work (1) applies a state-of-the-art reinforcement learning algorithm (DDPG) to a network of reactions with challenging dynamics and practical significance. (2) Disturbances and measurement uncertainties have been simulated. In addition, (3) we defined an observation space that is based on the working concept of a PID controller, optimized the reward function to achieve the desired controller performance, and evaluated the performance of the RL controller in terms of setpoint tracking, disturbance rejection, and robustness to parameter uncertainties.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.23919/ecc51009.2020.9143688

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 9

Metadata

Authors
Alhazmi, K., & Sarathy, S. M.
Affiliations
King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (SA)
Venue
2020 European Control Conference (ECC)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2020-05
Pages
1066-1068
OpenAlex
W3045551696
Cited by
9
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 3
FWCI
0.29
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Control Conference (ECC) (publishedVersion)
  • King Abdullah University of Science and Technology Repository (King Abdullah University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Advanced Control Systems Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Adaptive Dynamic Programming Control
Keywords
reinforcement learning control, chemical reaction networks, deep deterministic policy gradient, continuous process control, disturbance rejection, reference tracking, robustness to parameter uncertainty, reward function design, model-free control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review