The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Continuous Control of Complex Chemical Reaction Network with Reinforcement Learning
Abstract
The goal of process control is to maintain a process at the desired operating conditions. Disturbances, measurement uncertainties, and high-order dynamics in complex and highly integrated chemical processes pose a challenging control problem. Even though advanced process controllers, such as Model Predictive Control (MPC), have been successfully implemented to solve hard control problems, they are difficult to develop, rely on a process model, and require high performance computers and continuous maintenance. Reinforcement learning presents an appealing option for such complex systems, but little work has been done to apply reinforcement learning in chemical reactions with practical significance, to discuss the structure of the RL agent, and to evaluate the performance against benchmark measures. This work (1) applies a state-of-the-art reinforcement learning algorithm (DDPG) to a network of reactions with challenging dynamics and practical significance. (2) Disturbances and measurement uncertainties have been simulated. In addition, (3) we defined an observation space that is based on the working concept of a PID controller, optimized the reward function to achieve the desired controller performance, and evaluated the performance of the RL controller in terms of setpoint tracking, disturbance rejection, and robustness to parameter uncertainties.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The hydraulic actions can be rapidly and precisely controlled so that the resulting mechanical action can be easily controlled [29, 30].”
From Deep reinforcement learning-based adaptive fuzzy control for electro-hydraulic servo system (2025) · cites this paper as [30]
Citations
Cites
Continuous control with deep reinforcement learning
Lillicrap, T. P., Hunt, J. J., Pritzel, A., Heess, N., Erez, T., Tassa, Y., Silver, D., & Wierstra, D. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1509.02971 · Cited by 10,782
Reinforcement Learning – Overview of recent progress and implications for process control
Shin, J., Badgwell, T. A., Liu, K.-H., & Lee, J. H. (2019) · Computers & Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2019.05.029 · Cited by 322
Process control via artificial neural networks and reinforcement learning
Hoskins, J. C., & Himmelblau, D. M. (1992) · Computers & Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/0098-1354(92)80045-b · Cited by 121
Reinforcement Learning – Overview of Recent Progress and Implications for Process Control
Badgwell, T. A., Lee, J. H., & Liu, K.-H. (2018) · Computer-aided chemical engineering/Computer aided chemical engineering · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-64241-7.50008-2 · Cited by 50
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Deep reinforcement learning-based adaptive fuzzy control for electro-hydraulic servo system
Khater, A. A., Fekry, M., El-Bardini, M., & El-Nagar, A. M. (2025) · Neural Computing and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00521-024-10741-x · Cited by 17
“The hydraulic actions can be rapidly and precisely controlled so that the resulting mechanical action can be easily controlled [29, 30].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Alhazmi, K., & Sarathy, S. M.
- Affiliations
- King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (SA)
- Venue
- 2020 European Control Conference (ECC)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2020-05
- Pages
- 1066-1068
- OpenAlex
- W3045551696
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 3
- FWCI
- 0.29
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Control Conference (ECC) (publishedVersion)
- King Abdullah University of Science and Technology Repository (King Abdullah University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Advanced Control Systems Optimization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Adaptive Dynamic Programming Control
- Keywords
- reinforcement learning control, chemical reaction networks, deep deterministic policy gradient, continuous process control, disturbance rejection, reference tracking, robustness to parameter uncertainty, reward function design, model-free control
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review