Cited by 13Robotics and Sensor-Based LocalizationTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor NetworksInertial Sensor and Navigation

Simultaneous Localization and Mapping Using a Novel Dual Quaternion Particle Filter

Open access
Li, Kailai, Kurz, Gerhard, Bernreiter, Lukas, Hanebeck, Uwe D.·2018·2018 21st International Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION)

Abstract

In this paper, we present a novel approach to perform simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) for planar motions based on stochastic filtering with dual quaternion particles using low-cost range and gyro sensor data. Here, SE(2) states are represented by unit dual quaternions and further get stochastically modeled by a distribution from directional statistics such that particles can be generated by random sampling. To build the full SLAM system, a novel dual quaternion particle filter based on Rao-Blackwellization is proposed for the tracking block, which is further integrated with an occupancy grid mapping block. Unlike previously proposed filtering approaches, our method can perform tracking in the presence of multi-modal noise in unknown environments while giving reasonable mapping results. The approach is further evaluated using a walking robot with on-board ultrasonic sensors and an IMU sensor navigating in an unknown environment in both simulated and real-world scenarios.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.23919/icif.2018.8455347

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dual quaternions have proven to be an efficient and useful representation for vision topics such as hand-eye calibration, simultaneous mapping and localisation, and pose estimation and tracking.

    “More specifically, they have proven to be an efficient and useful representation for many topics related to vision, such as hand-eye calibration [11], simultaneous mapping and localisation [12] and pose estimation and tracking [13]-[15].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, K., Kurz, G., Bernreiter, L., & Hanebeck, U. D.
Affiliations
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE)
Venue
2018 21st International Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2018-07
Pages
1668-1675
OpenAlex
W2889902238
Cited by
13
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
FWCI
4.78
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Locations
  • International Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION) (publishedVersion)
  • Repository KITopen (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • KITopen (other-oa)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (HA 3789/16-1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Target Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Inertial Sensor and Navigation
Keywords
SLAM, dual quaternions, particle filter, Rao-Blackwellization, circular statistics, occupancy grid mapping, ultrasonic sensors, inertial measurement unit, walking robot, planar motion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review