Cited by 2Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsThermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesAgricultural Science and Fertilization

Moving forward from “biochar revolution” to “biochar evolution”: Shaping a promising mitigation tool demands future research efforts

Open access
Kammann, Claudia I.·2013·Agricultural and Food Science

Abstract

In February 2013, the 2nd Nordic Biochar Seminar was successfully held in Helsinki, Finland. The fruitful meeting, well organized by Priit Tammeorg, offered a broad kaleidoscope of new insights into the novel interdisciplinary research topic of biochar. The papers in this issue clearly show that biochar use in agriculture can deliver benefits such as reductions in N2O emissions or N leaching (Kettunen and Saarnio), in addition to soil C storage without negative effects (Karer et al. , Anders et al. ). However, they also demonstrate that just one biochar addition does not turn each temperate fertile soil into a fertility miracle. In Terra preta sites, the pyrogenic carbon was likely an important ingredient, but it was combined with organic waste inputs and not used pure. Thus, yield-increasing pure-biochar effects in temperate soils are likely not a low-hanging fruit to be harvested without further ado. Rather, problematic soils should be the primary target; combined biochar-organics usage also deserves further research. However, considering the lack of political efforts to restore our planet's radiative balance, or tackle the challenges associated with soil degradation and resource consumption, no emerging chances should be missed. "Biochar" is such a chance – not more, but also not less. Shaping "biochar use in agriculture" into a safe, sustainable and economically feasible tool will only come at the cost of good hard research efforts; but it offers the unique chance to turn agricultural practices from being part of the problem into being part of the solution.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.23986/afsci.9328

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Including smaller, repeated, and economically feasible additions of biochar in composting, biogas production, or animal husbandry may turn 'biochar revolution' into biochar (soil) evolution at a pace that is economically feasible and more appropriate for soil formation processes.

    “Including smaller, repeated, and economically feasible additions of biochar in composting, biogas production, or in animal husbandry with its multitude of nutrient-rich organic wastes, may in the end turn “biochar revolution” into biochar (soil) evolution76, at a pace that is economically feasible, and more appropriate for soil formation processes.”

    From Plant growth improvement mediated by nitrate capture in co-composted biochar (2015) · cites this paper as [76]

    In the section headed “Manuscript received December 2013” (page unavailable), the paper advocates further research on combining biochar with organic wastes and on making agricultural biochar use economically feasible. It does not describe smaller, repeated additions in composting, biogas production, or animal husbandry, or say that such a pace is more appropriate for soil formation. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kammann, C. I.
Affiliations
Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen (DE)
Corresponding author
Kammann, Claudia I.
Venue
Agricultural and Food Science
Published
2013-12-18
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
371-372
ISSN
  • 1459-6067 (ISSN-L)
  • 1795-1895
OpenAlex
W1923864045
Cited by
2
References
5
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Agricultural and Food Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
Keywords
biochar, soil carbon storage, nitrous oxide emissions, nitrogen leaching, terra preta, pyrogenic carbon, soil fertility, soil degradation, greenhouse gas emissions reduction, sustainable agriculture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review