The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Adopting a Blended Learning Approach: Challenges Encountered and Lessons Learned in an Action Research Study
Open accessAbstract
Adopting a new teaching approach is often a daunting task especially if one is an early adopter in a limited-resource environment. This article describes the challenges encountered and the strategies used in pilot testing a blended instructional method in a large size class within the college of education at a medium-sized university. The main reasons for using the hybrid method were to improve student participation, preparation, and understanding as well as to encourage a more active rather than passive approach to learning which can be particularly difficult in large-sized, undergraduate courses. An action research study was used to document the adoption process and to measure the impact of the blended approach. The results of the action research study and the issues and barriers encountered when implementing a new instructional strategy are discussed as well as ideas for motivating and helping faculty when there is limited funding, training, and support available.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Kenney and Newcombe (2011) did their comparison to establish effectiveness in view of grades and found that blended learning had higher average score than the nonblended learning environment.”
From Blended learning effectiveness: the relationship between student characteristics, design features and outcomes (2017) · cites this paper as Kenney and Newcombe (2011)
Citations
Cites
Classroom organization and participation: college students’ perceptions
Weaver, R. R., & Qi, J. (2005) · The Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.1080/00221546.2005.11772299 · Cited by 393
Cited by
Kintu, M. J., Zhu, C., & Kagambe, E. (2017) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-017-0043-4 · Cited by 764
Metadata
- Authors
- Kenney, J., & Newcombe, E.
- Venue
- Online Learning
- Publisher
- The Online Learning Consortium
- Published
- 2011-02-18
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1092-8235 (ISSN-L)
- 2472-5730
- 2472-5749
- OpenAlex
- W2111910061
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 26.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Online Learning (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and E-Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
- Keywords
- blended learning, large class teaching, student participation, active learning, faculty support, pilot testing, undergraduate education, teacher professional development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review