Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 194Online and Blended LearningEducational Technology and E-LearningInnovative Teaching Methods

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Adopting a Blended Learning Approach: Challenges Encountered and Lessons Learned in an Action Research Study

Open access
Kenney, Jane, Newcombe, Ellen·2011·Online Learning

Abstract

Adopting a new teaching approach is often a daunting task especially if one is an early adopter in a limited-resource environment. This article describes the challenges encountered and the strategies used in pilot testing a blended instructional method in a large size class within the college of education at a medium-sized university. The main reasons for using the hybrid method were to improve student participation, preparation, and understanding as well as to encourage a more active rather than passive approach to learning which can be particularly difficult in large-sized, undergraduate courses. An action research study was used to document the adoption process and to measure the impact of the blended approach. The results of the action research study and the issues and barriers encountered when implementing a new instructional strategy are discussed as well as ideas for motivating and helping faculty when there is limited funding, training, and support available.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.24059/olj.v15i1.182

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 194

Metadata

Authors
Kenney, J., & Newcombe, E.
Venue
Online Learning
Published
2011-02-18
Volume
15
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 1092-8235 (ISSN-L)
  • 2472-5730
  • 2472-5749
OpenAlex
W2111910061
Cited by
194
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
26.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Online Learning (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and E-Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
Keywords
blended learning, large class teaching, student participation, active learning, faculty support, pilot testing, undergraduate education, teacher professional development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review