The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Learning Analytics Methods, Benefits, and Challenges in Higher Education: A Systematic Literature Review
Open accessAbstract
Higher education for the 21st century continues to promote discoveries in the field through learning analytics (LA). The problem is that the rapid embrace of of LA diverts educators’ attention from clearly identifying requirements and implications of using LA in higher education. LA is a promising emerging field, yet higher education stakeholders need to become further familiar with issues related to the use of LA in higher education. Few studies have synthesized previous studies to provide an overview of LA issues in higher education. To address the problem, a systemic literature review was conducted to provide an overview of methods, benefits, and challenges of using LA in higher education. The literature review revealed that LA uses various methods including visual data analysis techniques, social network analysis, semantic, and educational data mining including prediction, clustering, relationship mining, discovery with models, and separation of data for human judgment to analyze data. The benefits include targeted course offerings, curriculum development, student learning outcomes, behavior and process, personalized learning, improved instructor performance, post-educational employment opportunities, and enhanced research in the field of education. Challenges include issues related to data tracking, collection, evaluation, analysis; lack of connection to learning sciences; optimizing learning environments, and ethical and privacy issues. Such a comprehensive overview provides an integrative report for faculty, course developers, and administrators about methods, benefits, and challenges of LA so that they may apply LA more effectively to improve teaching and learning in higher education.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Business intelligence and analytics: from big data to big impact
Chen, H., Chiang, R. H. L., & Storey, V. C. (2012) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/41703503 · Cited by 6,250
Educational Data Mining: A review of the state of the art
Romero, C., & Ventura, S. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Part C (Applications and Reviews) · doi:10.1109/tsmcc.2010.2053532 · Cited by 2,251
Ethical and privacy principles for learning analytics
Pardo, A., & Siemens, G. (2014) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12152 · Cited by 577 · cited 2×
“According to Pea (2014), personalized learning and learning opportunities demonstrate an inability to leverage learning analytics optimally; therefore, “the endgame is personalized Cyberlearning at scale for everyone on the planet for any knowledge domain” (p.”
BackgroundThe Big (Data) Bang: Policy, Prospects, and Challenges
McNeely, C. L., & Hahm, J. (2014) · Review of Policy Research · doi:10.1111/ropr.12082 · Cited by 102
Cited by
Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Review
Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2988510 · Cited by 4,133
“learning analysis, recommendation, knowledge understanding and acquirement, based on machine learning, data mining and knowledge model [39].”
BackgroundThe current landscape of learning analytics in higher education
Viberg, O., Hatakka, M., Bälter, O., & Mavroudi, A. (2018) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.07.027 · Cited by 766
Visual learning analytics of educational data: A systematic literature review and research agenda
Vieira, C., Parsons, P., & Byrd, V. (2018) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.03.018 · Cited by 316
Renz, A., & Hilbig, R. (2020) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-020-00193-3 · Cited by 218
Learning analytics in European higher education—Trends and barriers
Tsai, Y.-S., Rates, D., Moreno-Marcos, P. M., Muñoz-Merino, P. J., Jivet, I., Scheffel, M., Drachsler, H., Delgado Kloos, C., & Gašević, D. (2020) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103933 · Cited by 192
Metadata
- Authors
- Nunn, S., Avella, J. T., Kanai, T., & Kebritchi, M.
- Venue
- Online Learning
- Publisher
- The Online Learning Consortium
- Published
- 2016-01-10
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 1092-8235 (ISSN-L)
- 2472-5730
- 2472-5749
- OpenAlex
- W2529553635
- Cited by
- 395
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 4.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Learning Analytics Methods, Benefits, and Challenges in Higher Education: A Systematic Literature Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.24059/olj.v20i2.790
- The paper
- Nunn, S., Avella, J. T., Kanai, T., & Kebritchi, M. (2016). Learning Analytics Methods, Benefits, and Challenges in Higher Education: A Systematic Literature Review. Online Learning. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v20i2.790
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.