Cited by 583Online Learning and AnalyticsPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in DataDigital Education and Society

Ethical and privacy principles for learning analytics

Pardo, Abelardo, Siemens, George·2014·British Journal of Educational Technology

Abstract

The massive adoption of technology in learning processes comes with an equally large capacity to track learners. Learning analytics aims at using the collected information to understand and improve the quality of a learning experience. The privacy and ethical issues that emerge in this context are tightly interconnected with other aspects such as trust, accountability and transparency. In this paper, a set of principles is identified to narrow the scope of the discussion and point to pragmatic approaches to help design and research learning experiences where important ethical and privacy issues are considered.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/bjet.12152

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Chilling brought about by learning analytics can harm the sharing of viewpoints and decrease pushing intellectual boundaries, both of which often require learner communities to engage in free, unrestricted speech and inquiry.

    “Chilling brought about by LA can harm the sharing of viewpoints and decrease pushing intellectual boundaries, both of which often require learner communities to engage in free, unrestricted speech and inquiry.98”
  • The use of AI and learning analytics in education entails a massive amount of personal data generated, captured, and analyzed to optimize learning experiences.

    “This digital revolution in education, particularly the use of AI and learning analytics in the field of education, entails a massive amount of personal data generated, captured, and analyzed to optimize learning experiences (Tzimas & Demetriadis, 2021; Pardo & Siemens, 2014).”

    From Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in education (2023) · cites this paper as Pardo & Siemens, 2014

  • In learning analytics, privacy and ethics are intertwined with trust, accountability, and transparency rather than confined to data security.

    “In learning analytics, privacy and ethics are intertwined with trust, accountability, and transparency rather than confined to data security (Pardo & Siemens, 2014).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 40 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Australian Government, 2006, Private sector information sheet 1A—national privacy principles
  2. Campbell J. P., 2007, Academic analytics, Educause Review, 42, 1
  3. FTC, 2010, Protecting consumer privacy in an era of rapid change, 1
  4. Ipsos MediaCT., 2011, Mobile internet & smartphone adoption, 1
  5. Klasnja P., 2009, International conference pervasive, 176
  6. Privacy Rights Clearinghouse, 1999, Privacy rights handbook, 335
  7. Sprenger P., 1999, Sun on privacy: “get over it”, Wired Magazine
  8. Teutsch P., 2009, Workshop interaction analysis and visualization for asynchronous communication, 1
  9. The White House, 2012, Consumer data privacy in a networked world, 62

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pardo, A., & Siemens, G.
Affiliations
The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
  • Pardo, Abelardo
  • Siemens, George
Venue
British Journal of Educational Technology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-04
Volume
45
Issue
3
Pages
438-450
ISSN
  • 0007-1013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8535
OpenAlex
W2149282659
Cited by
577
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 88 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 59 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 5
FWCI
42.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • British Journal of Educational Technology (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Digital Education and Society
Keywords
learning analytics, privacy, ethics, student progress monitoring, trust, accountability, transparency, ethical principles, privacy principles, educational technology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review