The Social Dimension of Asynchronous Learning Networks
Open accessAbstract
This paper argues that the social dimension is important to effectiveness of Asynchronous Learning Networks (ALNs) and needs to be taken into account in the design of courses. Evidence from an ethnographic study of the Teaching and Learning Online (TLO) course offered by the Institute of Education Technology at the Open University is presented in support of this argument. This study found that individual success or failure on the course depended upon the extent to which students were able to cross a threshold from feeling like outsiders to feeling like insiders. Factors affecting the construction of a sense of community are drawn out from interviews with students. The significance of these findings is discussed in relation to a situated model of learning as induction into a community of practice. Finally recommendations are made for the support of community building in the design of courses.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Distance learning is a process sensitive to social, cultural, and contextual factors.
“This paper views distance learning as a process that is sensitive to social, cultural, and contextual factors (Warschauer, 1998; Wegerif, 1998).”
From Questions of Culture in Distance Learning: A Research Review (2009) · cites this paper as Wegerif, 1998
The Introduction says social factors affect learning in asynchronous learning networks, and the Discussion links outcomes to course structure, access, and software design. The section on overcoming conflicts of discourses also describes differences in students’ language and backgrounds, but the paper does not clearly establish cultural factors as a distinct influence on distance learning. Its evidence comes from one computer-mediated course rather than distance learning generally. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- Lave, J. and E. Wenger, Situated Learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press(1991).
- Harasim, L., et al., Learning Networks. Cambridge, Ma: MIT (1995).
- Mason, R. and A. Kaye, eds. Mindweave: Computers, Communication and Distance Education. . Pergamon: Oxford (1989).
- Rowntree, D., Tutoring Online. British Journal of Educational Technology, 26, 3 (1995).
- Mason, R., Evaluating technology-based learning, in Innovative adult learning with innovative technology, B. Collis and G. Davies, Editors. Elsevier: Oxford. (1995).
- Yates, S., The Textuality of Computer Mediated Communication, . 1993, Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis. Open University.
- Wegerif, R. and N. Mercer, Using computer-based text analysis to integrate quantitative and qualitative methods in the investigation of collaborative learning. Language and Education, 11, 3 (1997).
- Harasim, Online Education: a New Domain, in Mindweave: Communication, Computers, and Distance Education, R.D. Mason and A.R. Kaye, Editors. Pergamon: Oxford. (1989).
- Graddol, D., Some CMC discourse properties and their educational significance, in Mindweave, A. Kaye, Editor. Pergamon: Oxford. (1989).
- Habermas, J., Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Cambridge: Polity Press (1990).
- Habermas, J., The Theory of Communicative Action. Vol 1. Cambridge: Polity Press (1991).
- Wegerif, R. and N. Mercer, Computers and reasoning through talk in the classroom. Language and Education, 10, 1 (1996).
- Kaye, Editor. Springer-Verlag: Heidelberg. (1991).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Swan, K. (2001) · Distance Education · doi:10.1080/0158791010220208 · Cited by 1,016 · see citing works
Van den Bossche, P., Gijselaers, W. H., Segers, M., & Kirschner, P. A. (2006) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496406292938 · Cited by 792 · see citing works
Artifacts and cultures-of-use in intercultural communication
Thorne, S. L. (2003) · Language Learning & Technology · doi:10.64152/10125/25200 · Cited by 573 · see citing works
A case study of constructivist instructional strategies for adult online learning
Ruey, S. (2010) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00965.x · Cited by 196 · see citing works
A cross‐cultural study of group process and development in online conferences
Gunawardena, C. N., Nolla, A. C., Wilson, P. L., Lopez‐Islas, J. R., Ramirez‐Angel, N., & Megchun‐Alpizar, R. M. (2001) · Distance Education · doi:10.1080/0158791010220106 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Evaluating Student Satisfaction with Blended Learning in a Gender-Segregated Environment
Abou Naaj, M., Nachouki, M., & Ankit, A. (2012) · Journal of Information Technology Education: Research · doi:10.28945/1692 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Biesenbach-Lucas, S. (2003) · Online Learning · doi:10.24059/olj.v7i3.1843 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Hartnett, M. K. (2015) · Australasian Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.14742/ajet.1526 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Questions of Culture in Distance Learning: A Research Review
Uzuner, S. (2009) · The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning · doi:10.19173/irrodl.v10i3.690 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
On the attractiveness of social media for language learning: a look at the state of the art
Zourou, K. (2012) · Alsic · doi:10.4000/alsic.2436 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Regulative processes in individual, 3D and computer supported cooperative learning contexts
de Jong, F., Kollöffel, B., van der Meijden, H., Staarman, J. K., & Janssen, J. (2005) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.10.023 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wegerif, R.
- Affiliations
- The Open University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Wegerif, Rupert
- ORCID
- Wegerif, Rupert
- Venue
- Online Learning
- Publisher
- The Online Learning Consortium
- Published
- 1998-03-01
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1092-8235 (ISSN-L)
- 2472-5730
- 2472-5749
- OpenAlex
- W24608060
- Cited by
- 637
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 42
- FWCI
- 98.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Online Learning (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology in Learning
- Keywords
- asynchronous learning networks, sense of community, social dimension of learning, communities of practice, situated learning, course design, school belonging, online course effectiveness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review