Cited by 637Online and Blended LearningInnovative Education and Learning PracticesEducational Technology in Learning

The Social Dimension of Asynchronous Learning Networks

Open access
Wegerif, Rupert·1998·Online Learning

Abstract

This paper argues that the social dimension is important to effectiveness of Asynchronous Learning Networks (ALNs) and needs to be taken into account in the design of courses. Evidence from an ethnographic study of the Teaching and Learning Online (TLO) course offered by the Institute of Education Technology at the Open University is presented in support of this argument. This study found that individual success or failure on the course depended upon the extent to which students were able to cross a threshold from feeling like outsiders to feeling like insiders. Factors affecting the construction of a sense of community are drawn out from interviews with students. The significance of these findings is discussed in relation to a situated model of learning as induction into a community of practice. Finally recommendations are made for the support of community building in the design of courses.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.24059/olj.v2i1.1928

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Distance learning is a process sensitive to social, cultural, and contextual factors.

    “This paper views distance learning as a process that is sensitive to social, cultural, and contextual factors (Warschauer, 1998; Wegerif, 1998).”

    From Questions of Culture in Distance Learning: A Research Review (2009) · cites this paper as Wegerif, 1998

    The Introduction says social factors affect learning in asynchronous learning networks, and the Discussion links outcomes to course structure, access, and software design. The section on overcoming conflicts of discourses also describes differences in students’ language and backgrounds, but the paper does not clearly establish cultural factors as a distinct influence on distance learning. Its evidence comes from one computer-mediated course rather than distance learning generally. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Lave, J. and E. Wenger, Situated Learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press(1991).
  2. Harasim, L., et al., Learning Networks. Cambridge, Ma: MIT (1995).
  3. Mason, R. and A. Kaye, eds. Mindweave: Computers, Communication and Distance Education. . Pergamon: Oxford (1989).
  4. Rowntree, D., Tutoring Online. British Journal of Educational Technology, 26, 3 (1995).
  5. Mason, R., Evaluating technology-based learning, in Innovative adult learning with innovative technology, B. Collis and G. Davies, Editors. Elsevier: Oxford. (1995).
  6. Yates, S., The Textuality of Computer Mediated Communication, . 1993, Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis. Open University.
  7. Wegerif, R. and N. Mercer, Using computer-based text analysis to integrate quantitative and qualitative methods in the investigation of collaborative learning. Language and Education, 11, 3 (1997).
  8. Harasim, Online Education: a New Domain, in Mindweave: Communication, Computers, and Distance Education, R.D. Mason and A.R. Kaye, Editors. Pergamon: Oxford. (1989).
  9. Graddol, D., Some CMC discourse properties and their educational significance, in Mindweave, A. Kaye, Editor. Pergamon: Oxford. (1989).
  10. Habermas, J., Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Cambridge: Polity Press (1990).
  11. Habermas, J., The Theory of Communicative Action. Vol 1. Cambridge: Polity Press (1991).
  12. Wegerif, R. and N. Mercer, Computers and reasoning through talk in the classroom. Language and Education, 10, 1 (1996).
  13. Kaye, Editor. Springer-Verlag: Heidelberg. (1991).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wegerif, R.
Affiliations
The Open University (GB)
Corresponding author
Wegerif, Rupert
Venue
Online Learning
Published
1998-03-01
Volume
2
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 1092-8235 (ISSN-L)
  • 2472-5730
  • 2472-5749
OpenAlex
W24608060
Cited by
637
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 42
FWCI
98.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Online Learning (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology in Learning
Keywords
asynchronous learning networks, sense of community, social dimension of learning, communities of practice, situated learning, course design, school belonging, online course effectiveness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review