The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
NETWORK ANALYSIS OF KNOWLEDGE CONSTRUCTION IN ASYNCHRONOUS LEARNING NETWORKS
Open accessAbstract
Asynchronous Learning Networks (ALNs) make the process of collaboration more transparent, because a transcript of conference messages can be used to assess individual roles and contributions and the collaborative process itself. This study considers three aspects of ALNs: the design; the quality of the resulting knowledge construction process; and cohesion, role and power network structures. The design is evaluated according to the Social Interdependence Theory of CooperativeLearning. The quality of the knowledge construction process is evaluated through Content Analysis; and the network structures are analyzed using Social Network Analysis of the response relations among participants during online discussions. In this research we analyze data from two three-monthlong ALN academic university courses: a formal, structured, closed forum and an informal, nonstructured, open forum. We found that in the structured ALN, the knowledge construction processreached a very high phase of critical thinking and developed cohesive cliques. The students took on bridging and triggering roles, while the tutor had relatively little power. In the non-structured ALN, the knowledge construction process reached a low phase of cognitive activity; few cliques were constructed; most of the students took on the passive role of teacher-followers; and the tutor was at the center of activity. These differences are statistically significant. We conclude that a well-designed ALN develops significant, distinct cohesion, and role and power structures lead the knowledge construction process to high phases of critical thinking.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications
Wasserman, S. S., & Faust, K. (1994) · Cited by 17,961
Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification
Freeman, L. C. (1978) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7 · Cited by 17,062 · cited 2×
“... is used in a wide range of applications, from analyzing relations within families [23] to analysis of a Military C4ISR (Command, Control, Communications, Computers and Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance) network [24]; from analyzing the positions of adolescents in social networks and their sexual exper…”
BackgroundMethod(2017) · The SAGE Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods · doi:10.4135/9781483381411.n575 · Cited by 6,008
Social Network Analysis: A Handbook.
Pappi, F. U., & Scott, J. (1993) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2075047 · Cited by 5,969
Introduction to Social Network Methods
Hanneman, R. A. (2001) · Cited by 3,889
Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification
Bonacich, P. (1972) · The Journal of Mathematical Sociology · doi:10.1080/0022250x.1972.9989806 · Cited by 3,207
Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001) · American Journal of Distance Education · doi:10.1080/08923640109527071 · Cited by 3,044
Learning Together and Alone: Cooperative, Competitive, and Individualistic Learning
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1998) · Cited by 2,586
Gunawardena, C. N., Lowe, C. A., & Anderson, T. (1997) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.2190/7mqv-x9uj-c7q3-nrag · Cited by 1,646
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2021) · Pioneering Perspectives in Cooperative Learning · doi:10.4324/9781003106760-3 · Cited by 1,308
Cited by
Facilitating Cognitive Presence in Online Learning: Interaction Is Not Enough
Garrison, D. R., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2005) · American Journal of Distance Education · doi:10.1207/s15389286ajde1903_2 · Cited by 1,474
Learning analytics: drivers, developments and challenges
Ferguson, R. (2012) · International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning · doi:10.1504/ijtel.2012.051816 · Cited by 1,354
The influence of instructional methods on the quality of online discussion
Kanuka, H., Rourke, L., & Laflamme, E. (2007) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00620.x · Cited by 296
Metadata
- Authors
- Aviv, R., Erlich, Z., Ravid, G., & Geva, A.
- Venue
- Online Learning
- Publisher
- The Online Learning Consortium
- Published
- 2019-03-19
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 1092-8235 (ISSN-L)
- 2472-5730
- 2472-5749
- OpenAlex
- W2136345557
- Cited by
- 377
- References
- 26
- FWCI
- 94.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: NETWORK ANALYSIS OF KNOWLEDGE CONSTRUCTION IN ASYNCHRONOUS LEARNING NETWORKS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.24059/olj.v7i3.1842
- The paper
- Aviv, R., Erlich, Z., Ravid, G., & Geva, A. (2019). NETWORK ANALYSIS OF KNOWLEDGE CONSTRUCTION IN ASYNCHRONOUS LEARNING NETWORKS. Online Learning. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v7i3.1842
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.