Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,308

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Learning Together and Alone

Johnson, David W., Johnson, Roger T.·2021·Pioneering Perspectives in Cooperative Learning

Abstract

The origin of our approach to cooperative learning has two quite distinct roots. David’s commitment to cooperative learning came from his involvement in the civil rights movement of the late 1950s and early 1960s, while Roger’s interest in cooperative learning came from his involvement in the science education revolution of the early 1960s and his involvement in the development of the ESS Science Inquiry Curriculum. Our method of cooperative learning is known as the “Learning Together and Alone” method, based on the title of our first book and our belief that all three ways of structuring learning situations (cooperative, competitive, and individualistic) were appropriate under certain conditions. The development of our method consisted of four components. First, it was based on a well-formulated theory. We choose Deutsch’s theory of cooperation and competition as our theoretical base. Second, the theory was well validated by research. Our research efforts consisted of extensive reviews of the existing research literature and a systematic program of research to further validate and extend the theory. Social interdependence theory was the result. Third, our operational procedures for instructors and other educators were derived from the validated theory and spelled out as a conceptual structure that allowed instructors to plan any lesson in any curriculum for any age student to be cooperative. Our operational procedures included both the teacher’s role in our four types of cooperative learning (formal, informal, cooperative base groups, and constructive controversy) and the five basic elements that are required to make a learning situation cooperative (positive interdependence, individual accountability, promotive interaction, social skills, group processing). Fourth, we implemented our method of cooperative learning throughout North America, Western and Eastern Europe, and much of the Middle East, Asia, Africa, and Central and South America. This worldwide implementation was enhanced by our web site and our annual newsletter. We also helped found several Cooperative Learning Centers around the world based on and affiliated with our Cooperative Learning Center at the University of Minnesota.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9781003106760-3

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 1,308

Metadata

Authors
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T.
Venue
Pioneering Perspectives in Cooperative Learning
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2021-03-02
Pages
44-62
OpenAlex
W1518343983
Cited by
1,308
References
2
FWCI
126.68
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Learning Together and Alone. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781003106760-3
The paper
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2021). Learning Together and Alone. Pioneering Perspectives in Cooperative Learning. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003106760-3

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.