School-based tobacco-control programming and student smoking behaviour
Abstract
The study examined the association of a school-based tobacco-control program with students’ smoking behaviour over time using three cross-sectional, provincial census datasets (grade 10 students in 1999, grade 11 students in 2000, grade 12 students in 2001). Data were collected from all secondary schools in Prince Edward Island (Canada) using the Tobacco module of the School Health Action, Planning and Evaluation System (SHAPES). The proportion of regular smokers increased from grade 10 (22.3%) to grade 12 (27.8%, χ2 = 10.35, df = 1, p $lt; 0.001). Being exposed to different school-based tobacco programs and policies in grades 10 and 11 was not associated with the smoking behaviour of grade 12 students. The strongest predictors of smoking behaviour were having friends or close family members who smoke. This preliminary evidence suggests that programs and policies associated with banning smoking and enforcing smoking restrictions at school may be insufficient unless they also address the influence of smoking peers and family members and link to comprehensive programming within the broader context of other community and policy level interventions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In some cross-sectional observational studies, students at schools with stronger policies restricting tobacco use were less likely to be current smokers.
“In some, but not other, cross-sectional observational studies, students at schools with stronger policies restricting tobacco use were less likely to be current smokers.”
From Population Approaches to Improve Diet, Physical Activity, and Smoking Habits: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association (2012) · cites this paper as [449]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 41 · Cited by 18
- Authors
- Murnaghan, D., Leatherdale, S., Sihvonen, M., & Kekki, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Prince Edward Island (CA)
- University of Waterloo (CA)
- University of Helsinki (FI)
- Venue
- Chronic Diseases in Canada
- Publisher
- Health Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention Branch (HPCDP) Public Health Agency of Canada
- Published
- 2009-10
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 169-177
- ISSN
- 0228-8699 (ISSN-L)
- 1481-8523
- OpenAlex
- W77655817
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 1.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Chronic diseases in Canada (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Keywords
- adolescent smoking, peer influence, household smoking, school smoking bans, smoking restrictions, high school students, Prince Edward Island
- MeSH terms
- Smoking Prevention, Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Cross-Sectional Studies, Family, Female, Health Policy, Humans, Male, Peer Group, Preventive Health Services, Prince Edward Island, Surveys and Questionnaires, Schools, Smoking, Health Behavior, Logistic Models, Smoking Cessation, Censuses
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review