The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
EXAMINING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN IT PROJECT RISK MANAGEMENT AND BENEFITS REALIZED FROM IT PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION WITHIN THE PUBLIC SECTOR
Open accessAbstract
Information technology (IT) has become increasingly critical in today's digital world, supporting, sustaining, and driving growth in public organizations. The board of directors and senior management have traditionally delegated, disregarded, or avoided IT decisions. The majority of public sector organizations have realized that such a mindset is outdated and must be avoided. Being a foundation for effective enterprise governance, the IT risk management domain seeks to guarantee that a structure exists for identifying, analyzing, mitigating, monitoring and communicating an organization's IT risk to ensure successful IT project implementation. This research, therefore, sought to examine the relationship between risk management of IT projects and the hypothesized benefits from IT investments, namely Return on Investments (ROI), number of customers served and the level of customer service delivery. A total of 309 out of 517 public sector organizations in Kenya were sampled, and data were collected from heads of departments, including IT, Finance, HR, Audit, and Technical among others, through an online research tool. The correlation results revealed that IT risk management and ROI had a weak and negative correlation. The correlation between the management of IT risk and the number of customers served was equally found to be weak and negative. However, the correlation between IT risk management and customer service delivery was positive and significant. Results from the multivariate regression test revealed that risk management of IT projects significantly improved customer service delivery but had no significant effect on both ROI and number of customers. The study concluded that there was a significant effect of IT risk management on the customer service delivery. Therefore, senior management had a responsibility to ensure that IT risk management was incorporated in all major IT projects to ensure that improved customer service delivery benefit was realized.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Bitta, F., Oboko, R., & Chepken, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Nairobi (KE)
- Venue
- Malaysian Journal of Computing
- Publisher
- Universiti Teknologi MARA
- Published
- 2026-04-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 2348-2366
- ISSN
- 2231-7473 (ISSN-L)
- 2600-8238
- OpenAlex
- W7162002161
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- MALAYSIAN JOURNAL OF COMPUTING (publishedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- UiTM Institutional Repositories (Universiti Teknologi MARA) (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Technology Governance and Strategy
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › E-Government and Public Services
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Systems Education and Curriculum Development
- Keywords
- IT project risk management, return on investment, customer service delivery, public sector IT, IT governance, Kenya
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review