The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Género, ciudadanía y cuidado: aportes al debate en América Latina / Gender, Citizenship and Care: Contributions in Latin America
Abstract
En el presente artículo se analiza lo relativo al llamado “trabajo de cuidado” (carework) atendiendo a su valoración social como contribución a la manutención de la comunidad política. Este tipo de trabajo, históricamente realizado por mujeres, supone la división del trabajo en “productivo” y “reproductivo” y la invisibilización de este último como parte de las condiciones que aseguran la cohesión y el bienestar de una sociedad. En este contexto se plantean argumentos a favor de vincular el concepto de cuidado –con sus implicaciones de género– con el de ciudadanía, de manera que el trabajo de cuidado se conceptúe como parte de los deberes de los ciudadanos hacia la comunidad política, pero también como un derecho que se garantice a quienes están en situación de vulnerabilidad.AbstractThis paper analyses some of the issues posed by carework from the perspective of its contribution to the maintenance and survival of political communities. Carework –which has been historically performed mainly by women- presupposes the sexual division of labour into “productive” and “reproductive”, and the exclusion of the later from the conditions that are considered as necessary to ensure society’s cohesion and welfare. The paper proposes arguments in favour of linking the concept of care (with its gendered implications) with the concept of citizenship, so as to conceptualise carework as part of the political duties of men and women towards their communities, but also as a right that can be guaranteed to anybody in situation of temporary or permanent vulnerability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Insurgent heritage as an ethics of place-based care also proposes that care should move beyond the private space and develop into a political communal concept to center it across multiple scales and life levels (Noddings, 1984;Gómez Urrutia, 2010;Robinson, 2011;Tronto, 2013;Armijo, 2017).”
From INSURGENT HERITAGE: Mobilizing Memory, Place‐based Care and Cultural Citizenships (2022) · cites this paper as Gómez Urrutia, 2010
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center
Jackson, S. (1985) · Ufahamu A Journal of African Studies · doi:10.5070/f7143017029 · Cited by 4,441
Research works printed but not linked: 16
- Anthias, F. y N. Yuval-Davis (1992), Racialized Boundaries: Race, Nation, Gender, Color and Class and the Anti-Racist Struggle, londres, Routledge.
- Blanco, Mercedes (2002), "Trabajo y familia: entrelazamiento de trayectorias vitales", Estudios Demográficos y Urbanos, vol. 17, núm. 3 (51), pp. 485-521.
- Fraser, Nancy (1997), "From Distribution to Recognition: Dilemmas of Justice in a Post-socialist Age", Justice Interruptus: Critical Reflections on the "Post- socialist" Condition, Nueva York, Routldege, pp. 11-40.
- Gómez, Elsa (2008), "la valoración del trabajo no remunerado: una estrategia clave para la política de igualdad de género", La economía invisible y las desigualdades de género, Washington, OPS, pp. 3-19.
- Gould, Carol (1988), Rethinking Democracy, Cambridge, CUP.
- Kershaw, Paul (2006), "Carefair: Choice, Duty, and the Distribution of Care", Social Politics, núm. 13, pp. 341-371.
- Mouffe, Chantal (1992), "Feminism, Citizenship and Radical Democratic Politics", en J. Butler y J.W. Scott (coords.), Feminists Theorize the Political, londres-Nueva York, Routledge, pp. 369-384.
- Nussbaum, Martha (2000), Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach, Cambridge, CUP.
- Pateman, Carole (1988), The Sexual Contract, Cambridge, Polity Press.
- Phillips, Anne (1999), Which Equalities Matter?, Cambridge, Polity Press.
- Rawls, J. (1971), A Theory of Justice, Harvard, Harvard University Press.
- Shafir, Gerson (1998), "The Evolving Tradition of Citizenship", The Citizenship Debates, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, pp. 1-28.
- Todaro, Rosalba (2006), "¿Flexibilidad laboral o precarización? El debate sobre la reproducción social", en C. lópez et al. (comps.), América Latina, un debate pendiente, Montevideo, Repem/Dawn/IFC, pp. 135-160.
- UNDP (United Nations Development Programme) (1995), Human Development Report, Nueva York, Oxford University Press.
- UNDP (United Nations Development Programme) (1999), Human Development Report, Nueva York, Oxford University Press.
- Randall y G. Waylen (coords.), Gender, Politics and the State, londres, Routledge, pp. 29-44.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
INSURGENT HERITAGE: Mobilizing Memory, Place‐based Care and Cultural Citizenships
Novoa, M. (2022) · International Journal of Urban and Regional Research · doi:10.1111/1468-2427.13143 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Gómez Urrutia, V.
- Venue
- Estudios Demográficos y Urbanos
- Publisher
- El Colegio de Mexico, A.C.
- Published
- 2010-09-01
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 713
- ISSN
- 2448-6515
- 0186-7210
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 1
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Género, ciudadanía y cuidado: aportes al debate en América Latina / Gender, Citizenship and Care: Contributions in Latin America. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.24201/edu.v25i3.1364
- The paper
- Gómez Urrutia, V. (2010). Género, ciudadanía y cuidado: aportes al debate en América Latina / Gender, Citizenship and Care: Contributions in Latin America. Estudios Demográficos y Urbanos. https://doi.org/10.24201/edu.v25i3.1364