Cited by 3

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Género, ciudadanía y cuidado: aportes al debate en América Latina / Gender, Citizenship and Care: Contributions in Latin America

Gómez Urrutia, Verónica·2010·Estudios Demográficos y Urbanos

Abstract

En el presente artículo se analiza lo relativo al llamado “trabajo de cuidado” (carework) atendiendo a su valoración social como contribución a la manutención de la comunidad política. Este tipo de trabajo, históricamente realizado por mujeres, supone la división del trabajo en “productivo” y “reproductivo” y la invisibilización de este último como parte de las condiciones que aseguran la cohesión y el bienestar de una sociedad. En este contexto se plantean argumentos a favor de vincular el concepto de cuidado –con sus impli­caciones de género– con el de ciudadanía, de manera que el trabajo de cuidado se conceptúe como parte de los deberes de los ciudadanos hacia la comunidad política, pero también como un derecho que se garantice a quienes están en situación de vulnerabilidad.AbstractThis paper analyses some of the issues posed by carework from the perspective of its contri­bution to the maintenance and survival of political communities. Carework –which has been historically performed mainly by women- presupposes the sexual division of labour into “productive” and “reproductive”, and the exclusion of the later from the conditions that are considered as necessary to ensure society’s cohesion and welfare. The paper proposes arguments in favour of linking the concept of care (with its gendered implications) with the concept of citizenship, so as to conceptualise carework as part of the political duties of men and women towards their communities, but also as a right that can be guaranteed to anybody in situation of temporary or permanent vulnerability.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.24201/edu.v25i3.1364

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Anthias, F. y N. Yuval-Davis (1992), Racialized Boundaries: Race, Nation, Gender, Color and Class and the Anti-Racist Struggle, londres, Routledge.
  2. Blanco, Mercedes (2002), "Trabajo y familia: entrelazamiento de trayectorias vitales", Estudios Demográficos y Urbanos, vol. 17, núm. 3 (51), pp. 485-521.
  3. Fraser, Nancy (1997), "From Distribution to Recognition: Dilemmas of Justice in a Post-socialist Age", Justice Interruptus: Critical Reflections on the "Post- socialist" Condition, Nueva York, Routldege, pp. 11-40.
  4. Gómez, Elsa (2008), "la valoración del trabajo no remunerado: una estrategia clave para la política de igualdad de género", La economía invisible y las desigualdades de género, Washington, OPS, pp. 3-19.
  5. Gould, Carol (1988), Rethinking Democracy, Cambridge, CUP.
  6. Kershaw, Paul (2006), "Carefair: Choice, Duty, and the Distribution of Care", Social Politics, núm. 13, pp. 341-371.
  7. Mouffe, Chantal (1992), "Feminism, Citizenship and Radical Democratic Politics", en J. Butler y J.W. Scott (coords.), Feminists Theorize the Political, londres-Nueva York, Routledge, pp. 369-384.
  8. Nussbaum, Martha (2000), Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach, Cambridge, CUP.
  9. Pateman, Carole (1988), The Sexual Contract, Cambridge, Polity Press.
  10. Phillips, Anne (1999), Which Equalities Matter?, Cambridge, Polity Press.
  11. Rawls, J. (1971), A Theory of Justice, Harvard, Harvard University Press.
  12. Shafir, Gerson (1998), "The Evolving Tradition of Citizenship", The Citizenship Debates, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, pp. 1-28.
  13. Todaro, Rosalba (2006), "¿Flexibilidad laboral o precarización? El debate sobre la reproducción social", en C. lópez et al. (comps.), América Latina, un debate pendiente, Montevideo, Repem/Dawn/IFC, pp. 135-160.
  14. UNDP (United Nations Development Programme) (1995), Human Development Report, Nueva York, Oxford University Press.
  15. UNDP (United Nations Development Programme) (1999), Human Development Report, Nueva York, Oxford University Press.
  16. Randall y G. Waylen (coords.), Gender, Politics and the State, londres, Routledge, pp. 29-44.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 3

Metadata

Authors
Gómez Urrutia, V.
Venue
Estudios Demográficos y Urbanos
Published
2010-09-01
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
713
ISSN
  • 2448-6515
  • 0186-7210
Cited by
3
References
1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Género, ciudadanía y cuidado: aportes al debate en América Latina / Gender, Citizenship and Care: Contributions in Latin America. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.24201/edu.v25i3.1364
The paper
Gómez Urrutia, V. (2010). Género, ciudadanía y cuidado: aportes al debate en América Latina / Gender, Citizenship and Care: Contributions in Latin America. Estudios Demográficos y Urbanos. https://doi.org/10.24201/edu.v25i3.1364