Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center
Open accessAbstract
No abstract
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 34 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Interpretationreasoning§ Bell
This chauvinism has led to a backlash in which Black women and other women of color have refused to join the feminist movement.
“This chauvinism has lead to a backlash where either e xplicitly or implicitly through their behavior --Black women and other women of color have refused to join them.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Bell
None of the writers Hooks, Davis or Joseph denies the existence of racism and elitism within the contemporary feminist movement.
“None of the writers previously alluded to --Hooks, Davis or Joseph --denies the existence of racism and elitism within the contemporary feminist movement.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Hooks, From Margin to Center
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Davis, Women, Race and Class
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Joseph and Lewis, Common Differences
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation§ Bell
Hooks, Davis and Joseph refute the reductionist analysis that combatting racism alone will mean that Black women will then ipso facto become liberated.
“Each further refutes the reductionist analysis that combatting racism alone, will mean that Black women will then ipso facto become liberated.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Hooks, From Margin to Center
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Davis, Women, Race and Class
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Joseph and Lewis, Common Differences
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 21
- May combine two claims. 12
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationreasoning§ BellOnly after recognition of common differences is acknowledged and the diversity of women's condition is made central to the feminist framework can the feminist movement move forward.
“Only after the recognition of common differences ~s acknowledged and the diversity of women's condition is made central to the feminist framework, can the feminist movement move forward.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ BellHooks contends that if feminists are to succeed in creating a viable mass movement against sexual oppression, it must account for the complexity and diversity of female experience and cease catering to the needs of a privileged few.
“Hooks contends that if feminists are to succeed in creating a viable mass movement against sexual oppression , it must account for the complexity and diversity of female experience and cease catering to the needs of a privileged few.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hooks, From Margin to Center
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ BellHooks comments that it was a mark of race and class privilege, as well as expression of freedom from many constraints of sexism placed upon working class women, that middle-class white women were able to make their interests the primary focus of the feminist movement and employ a rhetoric of commonality that made their condition synonymous with oppression.
“Furthermore, she comments that “It was a mark of race and class privilege, as well as the expression of treedom from many constraints of sexism placed upon working class women, that middle-class white women were able to make their interests the primary focus of the feminist movement and employ a rhetoric of commo~lity that made their condition synonymous with oppression .””
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hooks, p.6
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ BellHooks begins her discussion with a critique of the contemporary feminist movement that asserts that feminism in the U.S. has never emerged from the women who are the most victimized by sexist oppression-all non-white women and poor women.
“She be9ins her discussion with a critique of the contemporary feminist movement that asserts that “Feminism in the u.s. has never emerged from the women who are the most victimized by sexist oppression; women who arE' daily beaten down, mentally, physically and spiritually --women who are powerless to change thei~ condition in life: all non-white women and poor women.””
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hooks, p.5
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ BellFrom Margin to Center delineates the nexus of race, class, and sexual oppression upon the lives of Black women.
“From Margin to Center, a leading work in an emergent body-of literature written by Black feminists, clearly delineates the nexus of race, class and sexual oppression upon the lives of Black women.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hooks, From Margin to Center
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ BellHooks' book addresses major contradictions within the U.S. feminist movement, including Eurocentrism, elitism, opportunism, romanticism of sisterhood, and a false consciousness that targets men as the enemy and deflects attention from an economic system based on exploitation, racism, and sexual discrimination.
“Hooks' new book speaks directly to major contradictions within the feminist movement in the United States: Eurocentrism, elitism, opportunism, romaniticism of sisterhood, and a false consciousness which targets men as the enemy and deflects attention from an economic system based upon exploitation, racism and sexual discrimination.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hooks, From Margin to Center
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ BellA viable feminist framework must acknowledge that women are divided by sexist attitudes, racism, class privilege, and other prejudices, which have precluded their coming together and organizing effectively.
“A viable feminist framework must acknowledge that “women are divided by sexist attitudes, racism, class privilege , and a host of other I prejudices” which have 3 precluded their coming together and organizing effectively .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hooks, p.44
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ BellHooks, Davis and Joseph collectively provide a rationale for Black women's necessary participation in the feminist movement on their own terms.
“Bell Hooks' earlier work, Ain't I a W oman: Black Wome and Feminism (1981); Gloria I .Joseph and Jill Lewis', Commo Differences (1981); and Angela Y. Davis', Women, Rac-;;-a:n Class (1983), collectively provide a rationale for Blac ;o;nen' s necessRry participation in the feminist movement o our own terms .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Hooks, Ain't I a Woman
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Joseph and Lewis, Common Differences
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Davis, Women, Race and Class
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ BellHooks, Davis and Joseph contradict the notion that the feminist movement belongs to white women (middle-class white women at that), and challenge the idea that Black women do not have legitimate concerns related to gender and exploitation.
“Furthermore, these authors do however, contradict the notion that the feminist movement belongs to white women (middle-class white women at that), and challenge the 1.dea that Black women do not have legitimate concerns related to gender and exploitation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Hooks, From Margin to Center
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Davis, Women, Race and Class
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Joseph and Lewis, Common Differences
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ BellTogether, these works have explored Black women's multifaceted history and its various permutations: the impact of racism on Black women during slavery, the devaluation of Black womanhood, racism within the contemporary feminist movement, the relationship between mothers and daughters, sexual attitudes and sexuality, housework, birth control and struggle.
“Together, these works hav~ explored ou multifaceted history and its various permutations: the impac of racism on Black women during slavery, the devaluation of Black womanhood, racism within the contemporary feminist movement, the relationship between mothers and daughters, sexual atitudes and sexuality, housework, birth control and struggle.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Hooks, Ain't I a Woman
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Joseph and Lewis, Common Differences
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Davis, Women, Race and Class
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ BellWomen who were not opposed to patriarchy, capitalism, classism or racism labeled themselves feminists, yet claimed sisterhood with the very women they sought to silence and exclude from the struggle.
“Women who were not opposed to patriarchy, capitalism, classism or racism, labeled themselves feminists; yet these women claimed sisterhood with the very women they sought to silence and exclude from the struggle.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hooks, From Margin to Center
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ BellHooks, Davis and Joseph see Black women's feminist concerns as undeniable and speak in direct contrast to Black and African women (and men) who believe Black American and African women should beware of the term feminism as suspect, negative, and usually associated with middle-class white American women.
“Hooks, Davis and Joseph see Black women 's feminist concerns as undeniable and they speak in direct contrast to Black and African women (and men) who preoccupied by reactions to racism, cast aspersions and espouse the belief that ... Black American and African women should beware of the term 'feminism ' which is suspect, negative and usually associated with middle-class white American women who (e”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Hooks, From Margin to Center
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Davis, Women, Race and Class
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Joseph and Lewis, Common Differences
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ BellTo transform feminism, Hooks suggests that feminism be defined clearly as a movement to end sexist oppression as well as other forms of oppression and domination-not as a movement promoting a life-style choice or as gaining equality with men within an oppressive and exploitative system.
“To transform feminism and raise it fron this quagmire, Hooks suggests that feminism be define( clearly, as a movement to end sexist oppression as well a1 other forms of oppression and domination --not as a movemen1 promotinq a life-style choice or as gaining equality with me1 within an oppressive and exploitative system.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hooks, From Margin to Center
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). The quote only partly states this claim.
Premisecitation§ BellHooks, Davis and Joseph express repugnance for racism and elitism's tenacious grip on the feminist movement and its alienation of women of color.
“Instead, they express repugnance for its tenacious grip on the movement and its alienation of women of color.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Hooks, From Margin to Center
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Davis, Women, Race and Class
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Joseph and Lewis, Common Differences
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ BellIn her conclusion, Hooks enjoins women and men to support feminism and to restore its revolutionary life force by rethinking and reshaping its direction so that the experiences of people on the margin who suffer sexist oppression and other forms of group oppression are understood, addressed and incorporated into the making of theory and the planning of action.
“In her conclusion, Roods enjoins women and men to support feminism and to restore its revolutionary life force by “rethinking and reshaping its direction so that the experiences of people on the margin who suffer sexist oppression and other forms of group oppression are understood, addressed and incor~rated into the making of theory and the planning of action.””
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hooks, p.161
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ BellThe movement's stagnation and isolation form the very forces who could have galvanized feminism into a legitimate mass-based organization.
“Hence, the movement's stagnation and isolation form the very forces who could have galvanized feminism into a legitimate masf based organization .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ BellHooks argues effectively for an analysis that acknowledges the interdependence of race, sex and class and the necessity of fighting them through a combined and multi-pronged strategy.
“she pulls together the various strands and argues effectively for an analysis which acknowledges the interdependence of race, sex and class and the necessity of fighting them through a combined and multi-pronged strategy .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ BellBlack women's struggle is defined as one against the combined forces of racial, sexual, and class oppression.
“Instead, our struggle is defined as one against the combined forces of racial, sexual , and class oppression.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Hooks, From Margin to Center
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Davis, Women, Race and Class
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Joseph and Lewis, Common Differences
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ BellWomen are not a monolith; there is diversity, conflict, and differences in spite of the commonality of gender.
“women are not a monolithj group; there is diversity , there is conflict, and there are differences in spite of the commonality of gender.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hooks, From Margin to Center
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ BellHooks sidesteps Marxist orthodoxy of focusing on class to the exclusion of all else, transcends nationalist thinking of defining race as the sole barrier, and refuses to be seduced by the lure of sisterhood with women who have coopted feminism and appropriated it as a vehicle for their own self-serving needs.
“Hooks s killfully sidesteps the Marxist orthodxy of myoptically focusing on class to the exclusion of all else ; she transcends the nationalist thinking of defining race as the sole barrier ; and she refuses to be seduced by the lure of sisterhood with women who have coopted feminism and appropriated it as a vehicle for their own self-serving needs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ BellMen are not allowed to abdicate their obligation to struggle with women in bringing about an end to exploitation based upon race, class and sex.
“A. nd, men too, are not allowed to abdicate their obligation to struggle with women in bringing about an end to exploitation based upon race, class and sex .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ BellBlack women and other women of color are addressed and identified as principal characters in the struggle against sexism; they are brought front stage, center, no longer relegated to the wings.
“Black women and other women of color are addressed and identified as principal characters in the struggle against sexism; they are brought front stage , center, no longer relegated to the wings.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Black women are no longer silent and have entered the arena of debate and done their homework.
“Black women o.1re no longer silent.We have entered the arena of debate and we have done our homework.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Black women have begun to express compassion for themselves and to assess their own particular condition as women and as members of an oppressed ethnic group.
“As Black women we have begun tc express compassion for ourselves .We have begun to assess out own particular condition as women and as members of ar oppressed ethnic group.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Black women have dared to become advocates of feminism within an Afrocentric context.
“We have even dared to becomE advocates of feminism that 1s within an Afrocentri< context.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Black women have done this in spite of resistance and incisive criticism from Black women and Black men who deem feminism an inappropriate topic for them.
“We have done this in spite of resistance an< incisive criticism from Black women and Black men who deer feminism an inappropriate topic for us.”
The paper relies on this without support.
In increasing numbers, Black women's novels, poems, and expository works attest to their understanding that sexism is a barrier they must organize to eradicate.
“In increasing numbers our novels, poems and expository works attest to ou understanding that sexism is indeed a barrier which we mus organize to eradicate .”
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hegemonic Masculinity: Rethinking the Concept
Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. W. (2005) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/0891243205278639 · Cited by 9,367 · see citing works
Acker, J. R. (2006) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/0891243206289499 · Cited by 3,537 · see citing works
Choo, H. Y., & Ferree, M. M. (2010) · Sociological Theory · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9558.2010.01370.x · Cited by 1,698 · see citing works
Foundations of Place: A Multidisciplinary Framework for Place-Conscious Education
Gruenewald, D. A. (2003) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312040003619 · Cited by 1,214 · see citing works
Theorizing and Researching Intersectionality: A Challenge for Feminist Geography*
Valentine, G. (2007) · The Professional Geographer · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9272.2007.00587.x · Cited by 1,147 · see citing works
Alcoff, L. M. (2006) · doi:10.1093/0195137345.001.0001 · Cited by 1,120 · see citing works
Identity Construction: New Issues, New Directions
Cerulo, K. A. (1997) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.23.1.385 · Cited by 956 · see citing works
Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis: Articulating a Feminist Discourse Praxis1
Lazar, M. M. (2007) · Critical Discourse Studies · doi:10.1080/17405900701464816 · Cited by 999 · see citing works
Daly, K., & Chesney‐Lind, M. (1988) · Justice Quarterly · doi:10.1080/07418828800089871 · Cited by 863 · see citing works
The Color of Supremacy: Beyond the discourse of ‘white privilege’
Leonardo, Z. (2004) · Educational Philosophy and Theory · doi:10.1111/j.1469-5812.2004.00057.x · Cited by 830 · see citing works
Whiteness: A strategic rhetoric
Nakayama, T. K., & Krizek, R. L. (1995) · Quarterly Journal of Speech · doi:10.1080/00335639509384117 · Cited by 729 · see citing works
Intersections: The Simultaneity of Race, Gender and Class in Organization Studies
Holvino, E. (2008) · Gender Work and Organization · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0432.2008.00400.x · Cited by 709 · see citing works
Chakravartty, P., Kuo, R., Grubbs, V. N., & McIlwain, C. D. (2018) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1093/joc/jqy003 · Cited by 649 · see citing works
Nightingale, A. J. (2010) · Geoforum · doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.03.004 · Cited by 633 · see citing works
Beyond persuasion: A proposal for an invitational rhetoric
Foss, S. K., & Griffin, C. L. (1995) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637759509376345 · Cited by 581 · see citing works
A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century
Haraway, D. (2000) · doi:10.1007/978-1-137-05194-3_10 · Cited by 580 · see citing works
Ely, R. J., & MEYERSON, D. E. (2000) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0191-3085(00)22004-2 · Cited by 577 · see citing works
You Just Don't Understand: Troubled Engagements Between Feminists and IR Theorists
Tickner, J. A. (1997) · International Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1111/1468-2478.00060 · Cited by 487 · see citing works
Funds of knowledge and discourses and hybrid space
Barton, A. C., & Tan, E. (2008) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.20269 · Cited by 477 · see citing works
The Nature of Gender: Work, Gender, and Environment
Nightingale, A. J. (2006) · Environment and Planning D Society and Space · doi:10.1068/d01k · Cited by 473 · see citing works
Secules, S., McCall, C., Mejia, J. A., Beebe, C., Masters, A. S., Sánchez‐Peña, M. L., & Svyantek, M. (2021) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/jee.20377 · Cited by 471 · see citing works
From margins to center? The development and purpose of participatory research
Hall, B. L. (1992) · The American Sociologist · doi:10.1007/bf02691928 · Cited by 454 · see citing works
Feminist Approaches to Social Science: Epistemological and Methodological Tenets
Campbell, R., & Wasco, S. M. (2000) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1023/a:1005159716099 · Cited by 449 · see citing works
Work–Life, Diversity and Intersectionality: A Critical Review and Research Agenda
Özbilgin, M. F., Beauregard, T. A., Tatlι, A., & Bell, M. P. (2010) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2010.00291.x · Cited by 450 · see citing works
A Model for Diverse Learning Environments
Hurtado, S., Alvarez, C. L., Guillermo-Wann, C., Cuellar, M. G., & Arellano, L. (2012) · Higher education · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-2950-6_2 · Cited by 454 · see citing works
Masculinidade hegemônica: repensando o conceito
Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. W. (2013) · Revista Estudos Feministas · doi:10.1590/s0104-026x2013000100014 · Cited by 428 · see citing works
Rethinking sexualities in Africa
(2005) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.42-4336 · Cited by 423 · see citing works
Essence of Culture and a Sense of History: A Feminist Critique of Cultural Essentialism
Narayan, U. (1998) · Hypatia · doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.1998.tb01227.x · Cited by 420 · see citing works
Gender, urban space, and the right to everyday life
Beebeejaun, Y. (2016) · Journal of Urban Affairs · doi:10.1080/07352166.2016.1255526 · Cited by 418 · see citing works
Paxton, P. M., Kunovich, S., & Hughes, M. M. (2007) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.33.040406.131651 · Cited by 424 · see citing works
A Wake-Up Call: Equity, Inequality and Covid-19 Emergency Remote Teaching and Learning
Czerniewicz, L., Agherdien, N., Badenhorst, J., Belluigi, D. Z., Chambers, T., Chili, M. M., de Villiers, M., Felix, A., Gachago, D., Gokhale, C., et al. (2020) · Postdigital Science and Education · doi:10.1007/s42438-020-00187-4 · Cited by 465 · see citing works
Comstock, D. L., Hammer, T. R., Strentzsch, J. A., Cannon, K. B., Parsons, J., & Salazar, G. (2008) · Journal of Counseling & Development · doi:10.1002/j.1556-6678.2008.tb00510.x · Cited by 398 · see citing works
Culturally responsive computing: a theory revisited
Scott, K. A., Sheridan, K. M., & Clark, K. (2014) · Learning Media and Technology · doi:10.1080/17439884.2014.924966 · Cited by 384 · see citing works
Vulnerability, Ignorance, and Oppression
Gilson, E. C. (2010) · Hypatia · doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2010.01158.x · Cited by 397 · see citing works
Duffy, M. (2007) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/0891243207300764 · Cited by 375 · see citing works
Messing with gender in feminist political ecology
Mollett, S., & Faria, C. V. (2013) · Geoforum · doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.10.009 · Cited by 329 · see citing works
Few, A. L. (2007) · The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology · doi:10.1002/9781405165518.wbeosb028 · Cited by 369 · see citing works
Regimes of Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research: The Rigors of Reciprocity
Harrison, J., MacGibbon, L., & Morton, M. (2001) · Qualitative Inquiry · doi:10.1177/107780040100700305 · Cited by 366 · see citing works
Searching for wages and mothering from Afar: The case of Honduran transnational families
Schmalzbauer, L. (2004) · Journal of Marriage and Family · doi:10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00095.x · Cited by 366 · see citing works
Research, Teaching, and Service: Why Shouldn't Women's Work Count?
Park, S. M. (1996) · The Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.1080/00221546.1996.11780249 · Cited by 362 · see citing works
Mott, C., & Cockayne, D. (2017) · Gender Place & Culture · doi:10.1080/0966369x.2017.1339022 · Cited by 352 · see citing works
OVERCOMING PATRIARCHAL CONSTRAINTS:
Hondagneu‐Sotelo, P. (1992) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/089124392006003004 · Cited by 353 · see citing works
An Emic Approach to Intersectional Study of Diversity at Work: A Bourdieuan Framing
Tatlι, A., & Özbilgin, M. F. (2011) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00326.x · Cited by 353 · see citing works
Citizenship: Towards a Feminist Synthesis
Lister, R. (1997) · Feminist Review · doi:10.1080/014177897339641 · Cited by 339 · see citing works
Bodies (and Spaces) do Matter: The limits of performativity
Nelson, L. (1999) · Gender Place & Culture · doi:10.1080/09663699924926 · Cited by 327 · see citing works
Regarding Gender: Essentialism, Constructionism, and Feminist Psychology
Bohan, J. S. (1993) · Psychology of Women Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1993.tb00673.x · Cited by 321 · see citing works
Conceptualizing Resistance: Women's Leisure as Political Practice
Shaw, S. M. (2001) · Journal of Leisure Research · doi:10.1080/00222216.2001.11949937 · Cited by 303 · see citing works
Dimensions of Everyday Resistance: An Analytical Framework
Johansson, A., & Vinthagen, S. (2014) · Critical Sociology · doi:10.1177/0896920514524604 · Cited by 302 · see citing works
Being Lovingly, Knowingly Ignorant: White Feminism and Women of Color
Ortega, M. (2006) · Hypatia · doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2006.tb01113.x · Cited by 294 · see citing works
Sadowski, J. (2020) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/12240.001.0001 · Cited by 330 · see citing works
First Nations Women’s Encounters with Mainstream Health Care Services
Browne, A. J., & Fiske, J. (2001) · Western Journal of Nursing Research · doi:10.1177/019394590102300203 · Cited by 286 · see citing works
The Theory and Praxis of Intersectionality in Work and Organisations: Where Do We Go From Here?
Rodríguez, J. K., Holvino, E., Fletcher, J. K., & Nkomo, S. M. (2016) · Gender Work and Organization · doi:10.1111/gwao.12131 · Cited by 288 · see citing works
Simien, E. M. (2005) · Journal of Black Studies · doi:10.1177/0021934704265899 · Cited by 278 · see citing works
The Time- and Context-Contingent Nature of Intersectionality and Interlocking Oppressions
Hulko, W. (2008) · Affilia · doi:10.1177/0886109908326814 · Cited by 275 · see citing works
Analyses and Interventions: Anthropological Engagements with Environmentalism
Brosius, J. P. (1999) · Current Anthropology · doi:10.2307/2991397 · Cited by 275 · see citing works
Mainstreaming politics: Gendering practices and feminist theory
Bacchi, C. L., & Eveline, J. (2009) · University of Adelaide Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/upo9780980672381 · Cited by 272 · see citing works
Digital Storytelling as a Signature Pedagogy for the New Humanities
Benmayor, R. (2008) · Arts and Humanities in Higher Education · doi:10.1177/1474022208088648 · Cited by 256 · see citing works
BOS, A. L., GREENLEE, J. S., HOLMAN, M. R., OXLEY, Z. M., & LAY, J. C. (2022) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055421001027 · Cited by 250 · see citing works
Few, A. L., Stephens, D. P., & Rouse-Arnett, M. (2003) · Family Relations · doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2003.00205.x · Cited by 244 · see citing works
Redefining Hijab: American Muslim Women's Standpoints on Veiling
Droogsma, R. A. (2007) · Journal of Applied Communication Research · doi:10.1080/00909880701434299 · Cited by 244 · see citing works
Lazar, M. M. (2005) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/9780230599901_1 · Cited by 258 · see citing works
Histories of Feminist Ethnography
Visweswaran, K. (1997) · Annual Review of Anthropology · doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.26.1.591 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Morris, E. W., & Perry, B. L. (2017) · Sociology of Education · doi:10.1177/0038040717694876 · Cited by 244 · see citing works
The challenges of redressing the digital divide: a tale of two US cities
Kvasny, L., & Keil, M. (2005) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2575.2006.00207.x · Cited by 234 · see citing works
Programme to Practice: Gender and Feminism in Archaeology
Conkey, M. W., & Gero, J. M. (1997) · Annual Review of Anthropology · doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.26.1.411 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
HCI as heterodoxy: Technologies of identity and the queering of interaction with computers
Light, A. (2011) · Interacting with Computers · doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2011.02.002 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
Special Section: Anthropology of White Supremacy
Jesús, A. M. B., & Pierre, J. (2019) · American Anthropologist · doi:10.1111/aman.13351 · Cited by 228 · see citing works
Toward a Continuum of Intersectionality Theorizing for Feminist Social Work Scholarship
Mehrotra, G. R. (2010) · Affilia · doi:10.1177/0886109910384190 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
Second-Wave White Teacher Identity Studies
Jupp, J., Berry, T. R., & Lensmire, T. J. (2016) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654316629798 · Cited by 227 · see citing works
Resisting the Canon: Feminist Cultural Studies, Sport, and Technologies of the Body
Cole, C. L. (1993) · Journal of Sport and Social Issues · doi:10.1177/019372359301700202 · Cited by 225 · see citing works
Toward a unified theory of class, race, and gender
SACKS, K. B. (1989) · American Ethnologist · doi:10.1525/ae.1989.16.3.02a00080 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
Droogendyk, L., Wright, S. C., Lubensky, M. E., & Louis, W. R. (2016) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/josi.12168 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
Integrating Black Consciousness and Critical Race Feminism Into Family Studies Research
Few, A. L. (2007) · Journal of Family Issues · doi:10.1177/0192513x06297330 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Neurodiversity Studies: A New Critical Paradigm
(2020) · doi:10.4324/9780429322297 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
Osmond, M. W., & Thorne, B. (2008) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85764-0_23 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
THE DEVELOPMENT OF CHICANA FEMINIST DISCOURSE, 1970-1980
GARCIA, A. M. (1989) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/089124389003002004 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
CONTRADICTIONS OF FEMINIST METHODOLOGY
Gorelick, S. (1991) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/089124391005004002 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
A Gender Agenda: New Directions for Planning Theory
Sandercock, L., & Forsyth, A. (1992) · Journal of the American Planning Association · doi:10.1080/01944369208975534 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
The Philosophy and Politics of Quality in Qualitative Organizational Research
Amis, J., & Silk, M. (2008) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428107300341 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Naples, N. A. (1992) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/089124392006003006 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Intersectionality, migration and development
Bastia, T. (2014) · Progress in Development Studies · doi:10.1177/1464993414521330 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Environmental Justice and the New Pluralism
Schlosberg, D. (2002) · doi:10.1093/0199256411.001.0001 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
Against Marriage and Motherhood
Card, C. (1996) · Hypatia · doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.1996.tb01013.x · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Few‐Demo, A. L., & Glass, V. Q. (2015) · The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Race, Ethnicity, and Nationalism · doi:10.1002/9781118663202.wberen390 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Developing a Scale to Measure the Diversity of Feminist Attitudes
Henley, N. M., Meng, K., O'Brien, D., McCarthy, W. J., & Sockloskie, R. J. (1998) · Psychology of Women Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1998.tb00158.x · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Research, Teaching, and Service: Why Shouldn't Women's Work Count?
Park, S. M. (1996) · The Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.2307/2943903 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
“Abomination”—Life as a Bible Belt Gay
Barton, B. (2010) · Journal of Homosexuality · doi:10.1080/00918361003608558 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis
Lazar, M. M. (2014) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118584248.ch9 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
What Have the Feminists Done for Us? Feminist Theory and Organizational Resistance
Thomas, R., & Davies, A. (2005) · Organization · doi:10.1177/1350508405055945 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
Psychotherapy, Classism, and the Poor: Conspicuous by Their Absence.
Smith, L. (2005) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.60.7.687 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Social Criticism without Philosophy: An Encounter between Feminism and Postmodernism
Fraser, N. W., & Nicholson, L. J. (1988) · Theory Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/0263276488005002009 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Heynen, N. (2009) · Annals of the Association of American Geographers · doi:10.1080/00045600802683767 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
Meyers, D. T. (2002) · doi:10.1093/0195140419.001.0001 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
Gender Inequality and Cultural Differences
Okin, S. (1994) · Political Theory · doi:10.1177/0090591794022001002 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Who is the ‘Other‘?: A Postmodern Feminist Critique of Women and Development Theory and Practice
Parpart, J. L. (1993) · Development and Change · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7660.1993.tb00492.x · Cited by 172 · see citing works
School choice as ‘motherwork’: valuing African‐American women’s educational advocacy and resistance
Cooper, C. W. (2007) · International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education · doi:10.1080/09518390601176655 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Building Value‐Based Partnerships: Toward Solidarity With Oppressed Groups
Nelson, G. B., Prilleltensky, I., & MacGillivary, H. L. (2001) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1023/a:1010406400101 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Reclaiming a Conversation: The Ideal of the Educated Woman
Harding, S. (1985) · Journal of Education · doi:10.1177/002205748516700310 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Toward an Indigenous, decolonizing school leadership: A literature review
Khalifa, M. A., Khalil, D., Marsh, T. E. J., & Halloran, C. (2019) · Educational Administration Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0013161x18809348 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Women's Work and Chicano Families
Ζavella, P. (2018) · Cornell University Press eBooks · doi:10.7591/9781501720055 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
- Authors
- Jackson, S.
- Corresponding author
- Jackson, Sandra
- Venue
- Ufahamu A Journal of African Studies
- Publisher
- California Digital Library (CDL)
- Published
- 1985-01-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 0041-5715 (ISSN-L)
- 2150-5802
- OpenAlex
- W299429925
- Cited by
- 4,441
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 256 · 2024: 474 · 2023: 392 · 2022: 393 · 2021: 325 · 2020: 258 · 2019: 248 · 2018: 199 · 2017: 142 · 2016: 127 · 2015: 86 · 2014: 104 · 2013: 94 · 2012: 114
- FWCI
- 18.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.escholarship.org
- Locations
- Ufahamu A Journal of African Studies (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Feminist Theory and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminism, Gender, and Intersectionality
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
- Keywords
- feminist theory, marginality, women's studies, African feminism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review