The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Guidelines for retracting articles
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Both the 2019 COPE and ICMJE guidelines suggest that retraction notices should be linked to the retracted paper in all online versions (Committee on Publication Ethics, Barbour et al., 2019; International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, 2019).”
From Continued use of retracted papers: Temporal trends in citations and (lack of) awareness of retractions shown in citation contexts in biomedicine (2021) · cites this paper as Committee on Publication Ethics, Barbour et al., 2019
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hsiao, T.-K., & Schneider, J. (2021) · Quantitative Science Studies · doi:10.1162/qss_a_00155 · Cited by 98
Schneider, J., Ye, D., Hill, A. M., & Whitehorn, A. S. (2020) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-020-03631-1 · Cited by 88
A scoping review of the literature featuring research ethics and research integrity cases
Armond, A. C. V., Gordijn, B., Lewis, J., Hosseini, M., Bodnár, J. K., Holm, S., & Kakuk, P. (2021) · BMC Medical Ethics · doi:10.1186/s12910-021-00620-8 · Cited by 117
Publication ethics in the era of artificial intelligence
Kocak, Z. (2024) · Journal of Korean Medical Science · doi:10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e249 · Cited by 56
Correcting the Scientific Record: Retraction Practices in Chemistry and Materials Science
Coudert, F. (2019) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b00897 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Barbour, V., Kleinert, S., Wager, E., & Yentis, S.
- Publisher
- Committee on Publication Ethics
- Published
- 2009-09-01
- OpenAlex
- W2909301103
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 32 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 2 · 2012: 1
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Academic integrity and plagiarism
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Publishing and Scholarly Communication
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Academic Publishing and Open Access
- Keywords
- retraction, scholarly publishing, research integrity, publication ethics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
