Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 39Antibiotic Resistance in BacteriaPharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental ImpactsAntimicrobial agents and applications

The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.

Increasing antibiotic resistance in preservative-tolerant bacterial strains isolated from cosmetic products

Open access
Orús·2015·PubMed

Abstract

To ensure the microbiological quality, consumer safety and organoleptic properties of cosmetic products, manufacturers need to comply with defined standards using several preservatives and disinfectants. A drawback regarding the use of these preservatives is the possibility of generating cross-insusceptibility to other disinfectants or preservatives, as well as cross resistance to antibiotics. Therefore, the objective of this study was to understand the adaptive mechanisms of Enterobacter gergoviae, Pseudomonas putida and Burkholderia cepacia that are involved in recurrent contamination in cosmetic products containing preservatives. Diminished susceptibility to formaldehyde-donors was detected in isolates but not to other preservatives commonly used in the cosmetics industry, although increasing resistance to different antibiotics (β-lactams, quinolones, rifampicin, and tetracycline) was demonstrated in these strains when compared with the wild-type strain. The outer membrane protein modifications and efflux mechanism activities responsible for the resistance trait were evaluated. The development of antibiotic-resistant microorganisms due to the selective pressure from preservatives included in cosmetic products could be a risk for the emergence and spread of bacterial resistance in the environment. Nevertheless, the large contribution of disinfection and preservation cannot be denied in cosmetic products.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

OpenAlex · 10.2436/20.1501.01.234

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cited by

See all 39

Metadata

Authors
Orús
Venue
PubMed
Publisher
National Institutes of Health
Published
2015-03-01
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
51-9
OpenAlex
W2191592077
Cited by
39
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 19 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Estudis Romànics (Institut d'Estudis Catalans) (submittedVersion)
  • PubMed
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Microbiology (medical) › Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology › Antimicrobial agents and applications
Keywords
antibiotic resistance, cosmetics, preservatives, cross-resistance, Enterobacter gergoviae, Pseudomonas putida, Burkholderia cepacia, outer membrane proteins, efflux pumps, disinfectants, beta-lactam antibiotics, quinolones, tetracycline, rifampicin, microbial contamination
MeSH terms
Anti-Bacterial Agents, Cosmetics, Enterobacter, Humans, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Preservatives, Pharmaceutical, Pseudomonas, Burkholderia, Drug Resistance, Bacterial

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.