The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Reclaiming the Faravahar. Zoroastrian Survival in Contemporary Tehran
Open accessAbstract
iranian studies seriesThe Iranian Studies Series publishes high-quality scholarship on various aspects of Iranian civilisation, covering both contemporary and classical cultures of the Persian cultural area.The contemporary Persian-speaking area includes Iran, Afghanistan, Tajikistan, and Central Asia, while classical societies using Persian as a literary and cultural language were located in Anatolia, Caucasus, Central Asia and the Indo-Pakistani subcontinent.The objective of the series is to foster studies of the literary, historical, religious and linguistic products in Iranian languages.In addition to research monographs and reference works, the series publishes English-Persian critical text-editions of important texts.The series intends to publish resources and original research and make them accessible to a wide audience.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Circular and ring symbols of divine beings of goodness and divine light replete with wings that carry promises of wholeness are contrasted with artistic depictions of evil beings who express the dark triad of evil thoughts, evil deeds and evil words.
“Circular and ring symbols of divine beings of goodness and divine lightreplete with wings that carry promises of wholeness-are contrasted with artistic depictions of evil beings who express the dark triad of evil thoughts, evil deeds and evil words (Fozi, 2014).”
From Sacred Circle: Symbol of Wholeness in Traditional Persian Art and Architecture (2023) · cites this paper as Fozi, 2014
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sacred Circle: Symbol of Wholeness in Traditional Persian Art and Architecture
Darabimanesh, F. (2023) · Journal of Analytical Psychology · doi:10.1111/1468-5922.12954 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Fozi, N.
- Corresponding author
- Fozi, Navid
- ORCID
- Fozi, Navid
- Venue
- Leiden University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Leiden University Press
- Published
- 2014-10-01
- OpenAlex
- W2619534255
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 1.48
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc
- Locations
- Leiden University Press eBooks (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- BiblioBoard Library Catalog (Open Research Library) (submittedVersion)
- BiblioBoard Library Catalog (Open Research Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Directory of Open access Books (OAPEN Foundation) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- OAPEN (The OAPEN Foundation) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Universiteit Leiden
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Islamic Studies and History
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
- Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Religious Tourism and Spaces
- Keywords
- Zoroastrianism, religious survival, religious revival, ritual, religious space, authenticity, religious performance, minority religions, Tehran
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
