Cited by 13Veterinary Medicine and SurgeryReproductive Physiology in LivestockAnimal Behavior and Welfare Studies

Obstetric and newborn parameters in the Maine Coon cats

Open access
Socha, P., Lengling, R., Bonecka, J., Janowski, T.·2019·Polish Journal of Veterinary Sciences

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine several obstetric and neonatal parameters in the Maine Coon breed. The birth data of Maine Coon breeding population were collected of 52 litters from different households using a questionnaire. Significant relationships between various outcomes and the relevant predictors were assessed by multiple linear regression or logistic regression, as appropriate. The overall mean gestation length was 65.5±1.32 days. Larger litter size was associated with shorter gestation lengths (p⟨0.01). Mean litter size was 5.3±2.3 kittens. The weight of kittens born alive (overall mean 119.6±18.4 g) increased with prolonged gestation lengths (p⟨0.01) and decreased with larger litter sizes (p⟨0.01). In the analyzed group of kittens, 12.5% were stillborn. The expulsion intervals varied widely. The duration of the first stage of labour was less than 2h in 82.9% of the cats. The interval between the birth of the first and the last kitten was less than 6h in 99.3% of the cats, and it exceeded 6 h in only 2 cats. The present results can be used to develop references values and reliable assistance protocol for assessing the parturition in the Maine Coon to protect the queen and reduce perinatal losses.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.24425/pjvs.2019.129303

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Socha, P., Lengling, R., Bonecka, J., & Janowski, T.
Affiliations
  • University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn (PL)
  • Warsaw University of Life Sciences (PL)
Venue
Polish Journal of Veterinary Sciences
Published
2019-05-20
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
439-443
ISSN
1505-1773 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2995200708
Cited by
13
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4
FWCI
1.32
Type
journal article
Language
pl
Open access
Locations
  • Polish Journal of Veterinary Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Medicine and Surgery
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Reproductive Physiology in Livestock
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Keywords
Maine Coon cats, feline obstetrics, gestation length, litter size, stillbirth, childbirth, first stage of labor, perinatal mortality, reference values
MeSH terms
Animals, Animals, Newborn, Birth Weight, Cats, Data Collection, Female, Male, Pregnancy, Pregnancy, Animal, Surveys and Questionnaires, Parturition, Stillbirth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review