The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessing Browse Trend At The Landscape Level: Part 1: Preliminary Steps and Field Survey
Open accessAbstract
The Rangelands archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“There is a clear threshold of willow height needed for ecosystem recovery—willow stands must exceed 2 m in height [22,39].”
From Stream hydrology limits recovery of riparian ecosystems after wolf reintroduction (2013) · cites this paper as [39]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“This threshold is important because stems taller than 2 m exceed the reach of browsing ungulates, thereby providing a reliable seed source for willow establishment and preventing complete consumption of the plant during severe winters [39].”
From Stream hydrology limits recovery of riparian ecosystems after wolf reintroduction (2013) · cites this paper as [39]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Elk habitat use within a rest-rotation grazing system.
Frisina, M. R. (1992) · UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) · Cited by 52
Self-citation(1997) · Research Exchange (Washington State University) · Cited by 48
Self-citationBrowse Evaluation by Analysis of Growth Form
Keigley, R. B., & Frisina, M. R. (1998) · Cited by 40
Self-citationA growth form method for describing browse condition
Keigley, R. B. (1997) · UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) · Cited by 34
Self-citationMethods of Studying Shrubby Plants in Relation to Grazing
Nelson, E. W. (1930) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1932336 · Cited by 29
Browse Utilization Based on Percentage of Twig Numbers Browsed
Stickney, P. F. (1966) · Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3797908 · Cited by 28
A Winter Study of Mule Deer in Nevada
Aldous, C. M. (1945) · Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3795893 · Cited by 27
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [4]4. Julander, 0. 1937. Utilization of browse by wildlife. Transactions 2"* North American Wildlife Conference. pp. 277-285.
- [7]7. Keigley, R.B. 1998. Architecture of cottonwood as an index of browsing history in Yellowstone. Intermountain Journal of Sciences. 4:57-67.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Stream hydrology limits recovery of riparian ecosystems after wolf reintroduction
Marshall, K. N., Hobbs, N. T., & Cooper, D. J. (2013) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2012.2977 · Cited by 108
Historical landscape repeat photography as a tool for land use change research
Kull, C. A. (2005) · Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift - Norwegian Journal of Geography · doi:10.1080/00291950500375443 · Cited by 83
Effects of bison on willow and cottonwood in northern Yellowstone National Park
Painter, L. E., & Ripple, W. J. (2012) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2011.10.010 · Cited by 45
Averett, J. P., Endress, B. A., Rowland, M. M., Naylor, B. J., & Wisdom, M. J. (2017) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2017.02.017 · Cited by 38
Recoupling fire and aspen recruitment after wolf reintroduction in Yellowstone National Park, USA
Halofsky, J. S., Ripple, W. J., & Beschta, R. L. (2008) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2008.06.002 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Keigley, R. B., Frisina, M. R., Fager, C. W., & Society for Range Management
- Venue
- Rangelands
- Publisher
- University of Arizona
- Published
- 2002
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 0190-0528 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W188309390
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 1.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Rangelands (publishedVersion)
- UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Geological Survey
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Agricultural and Rural Development Research
- Keywords
- field survey, rangeland vegetation, forage crops
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
