The DOI matches its Crossref record; 91 of the 91 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mapping the frontiers and front lines of global environmental justice: the EJAtlas
Open accessAbstract
This article highlights the need for collaborative research on ecological conflicts within a global perspective. As the social metabolism of our industrial economy increases, intensifying extractive activities and the production of waste, the related social and environmental impacts generate conflicts and resistance across the world. This expansion of global capitalism leads to greater disconnection between the diverse geographies of injustice along commodity chains. Yet, at the same time, through the globalization of governance processes and Environmental Justice (EJ) movements, local political ecologies are becoming increasingly transnational and interconnected. We first make the case for the need for new approaches to understanding such interlinked conflicts through collaborative and engaged research between academia and civil society. We then present a large-scale research project aimed at understanding the determinants of resource extraction and waste disposal conflicts globally through a collaborative mapping initiative: The EJAtlas, the Global Atlas of Environmental Justice. This article introduces the EJAtlas mapping process and its methodology, describes the process of co-design and development of the atlas, and assesses the initial outcomes and contribution of the tool for activism, advocacy and scientific knowledge. We explain how the atlas can enrich EJ studies by going beyond the isolated case study approach to offer a wider systematic evidence-based enquiry into the politics, power relations and socio-metabolic processes surrounding environmental justice struggles locally and globally.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective
Haraway, D. (1988) · Feminist Studies · doi:10.2307/3178066 · Cited by 18,364
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective
Haraway, D. (1988) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 6,992
Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics
Fukuyama, F., Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. (1998) · Foreign Affairs · doi:10.2307/20048985 · Cited by 3,700
Epistemologies of the South: Justice Against Epistemicide
Wyse, J. P. (2015) · Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.1177/0094306115609925nn · Cited by 2,869
Sweetness and Power: The Place of Sugar in Modern History
Stein, S. J., & Mintz, S. W. (1986) · The American Historical Review · doi:10.2307/1858145 · Cited by 2,369
Dumping in Dixie: Race, Class, and Environmental Quality.
Hamilton, L. C., & Bullard, R. D. (1991) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2580094 · Cited by 2,335
Political ecology: a critical introduction
(2005) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.42-5341 · Cited by 2,246
DELINKING: The rhetoric of modernity, the logic of coloniality and the grammar of de-coloniality
Mignolo, W. D. (2007) · Cultural Studies · doi:10.1080/09502380601162647 · Cited by 2,178
Sweetness and power : the place of sugar in modern history
Roxborough, I., & Mintz, S. W. (1986) · Man · doi:10.2307/2803144 · Cited by 1,769
Diverse economies: performative practices for `other worlds'
Gibson-Graham, J. K. (2008) · Progress in Human Geography · doi:10.1177/0309132508090821 · Cited by 1,725
Cited by
The Lancet Commission on pollution and health
Landrigan, P. J., Fuller, R., Acosta, N. J. R., Adeyi, O., Arnold, R., Basu, N. (., Baldé, A. B., Bertollini, R., Bose-O'Reilly, S., Boufford, J. I., et al. (2018) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(17)32345-0 · Cited by 4,929
D'Ignazio, C., & Klein, L. F. (2020) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/11805.001.0001 · Cited by 1,738
Is there a global environmental justice movement?
Martinez-Alier, J., Temper, L., Del Bene, D., & Scheidel, A. (2016) · The Journal of Peasant Studies · doi:10.1080/03066150.2016.1141198 · Cited by 553
Self-citationDorninger, C., Hornborg, A., Abson, D. J., von Wehrden, H., Schaffartzik, A., Giljum, S., Engler, J.-O., Feller, R. L., Hubacek, K., & Wieland, H. (2021) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106824 · Cited by 544
Environmental conflicts and defenders: A global overview
Scheidel, A., Del Bene, D., Liu, J., Navas, G., Mingorría, S., Demaria, F., Avila, S., Roy, B., Ertör, I., Temper, L., et al. (2020) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102104 · Cited by 522
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Temper, L., & Shmelev, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Political Ecology
- Publisher
- University of Arizona
- Published
- 2015-12-01
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1073-0451 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2772802389
- Cited by
- 577
- References
- 91
- FWCI
- 81.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mapping the frontiers and front lines of global environmental justice: the EJAtlas. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2458/v22i1.21108
- The paper
- Temper, L., & Shmelev, S. (2015). Mapping the frontiers and front lines of global environmental justice: the EJAtlas. Journal of Political Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2458/v22i1.21108
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.