The DOI matches its Crossref record; 94 of the 94 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Global patterns of ecologically unequal exchange: Implications for sustainability in the 21st century
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Ecologically unequal exchange theory posits asymmetric net flows of biophysical resources from poorer to richer countries. To date, empirical evidence to support this theoretical notion as a systemic aspect of the global economy is largely lacking. Through environmentally-extended multi-regional input-output modelling, we provide empirical evidence for ecologically unequal exchange as a persistent feature of the global economy from 1990 to 2015. We identify the regions of origin and final consumption for four resource groups: materials, energy, land, and labor. By comparing the monetary exchange value of resources embodied in trade, we find significant international disparities in how resource provision is compensated. Value added per ton of raw material embodied in exports is 11 times higher in high-income countries than in those with the lowest income, and 28 times higher per unit of embodied labor. With the exception of embodied land for China and India, all other world regions serve as net exporters of all types of embodied resources to high-income countries across the 1990–2015 time period. On aggregate, ecologically unequal exchange allows high-income countries to simultaneously appropriate resources and to generate a monetary surplus through international trade. This has far-reaching implications for global sustainability and for the economic growth prospects of nations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2025) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 352,181
Capital in the Twenty-First Century
Piketty, T. (2014) · doi:10.4159/9780674369542 · Cited by 14,437
Multimodel Inference: Understanding AIC and BIC in Model Selection
Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2004) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124104268644 · Cited by 11,648
A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination
NAGELKERKE, N. J. D. (1991) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/78.3.691 · Cited by 5,927
The Entropy Law and the Economic Process
Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1971) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674281653 · Cited by 4,866
piecewiseSEM: Piecewise structural equation modelling in r for ecology, evolution, and systematics
Lefcheck, J. S. (2016) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.12512 · Cited by 4,845
The Entropy Law and the Economic Process.
Green, M. J., & Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1973) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2231206 · Cited by 2,985
Input-Output Analysis: Foundations and Extensions
Miller, R. E., & Blair, P. D. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108676212 · Cited by 2,826
Quantitative Input and Output Relations in the Economic Systems of the United States
Leontief, W. W. (1936) · The Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.2307/1927837 · Cited by 2,753
Quality Ladders in the Theory of Growth
Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. (1991) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.2307/2298044 · Cited by 2,552
Cited by
The unbearable heaviness of climate coloniality
Sultana, F. (2022) · Political Geography · doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2022.102638 · Cited by 952
What does degrowth mean? A few points of clarification
Hickel, J. (2021) · Globalizations · doi:10.1080/14747731.2020.1812222 · Cited by 401
Post-growth: the science of wellbeing within planetary boundaries
Kallis, G., Hickel, J., O’Neill, D. W., Jackson, T., Victor, P. A., Raworth, K., Schor, J. B., Steinberger, J. K., & Ürge-Vorsatz, D. (2025) · The Lancet Planetary Health · doi:10.1016/s2542-5196(24)00310-3 · Cited by 261
Hickel, J., O’Neill, D. W., Fanning, A. L., & Zoomkawala, H. (2022) · The Lancet Planetary Health · doi:10.1016/s2542-5196(22)00044-4 · Cited by 229
The “Greening” of Empire: The European Green Deal as the EU first agenda
Vela Almeida, D., Kolinjivadi, V., Ferrando, T., Roy, B., Herrera, H., Vecchione Gonçalves, M., & Van Hecken, G. (2023) · Political Geography · doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2023.102925 · Cited by 217
Metadata
- Authors
- Dorninger, C., Hornborg, A., Abson, D. J., von Wehrden, H., Schaffartzik, A., Giljum, S., Engler, J.-O., Feller, R. L., Hubacek, K., & Wieland, H.
- Venue
- Ecological Economics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-01
- Volume
- 179
- Pages
- 106824
- ISSN
- 0921-8009 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3083280272
- Cited by
- 544
- References
- 94
- FWCI
- 18.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Global patterns of ecologically unequal exchange: Implications for sustainability in the 21st century. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106824
- The paper
- Dorninger, C., Hornborg, A., Abson, D. J., von Wehrden, H., Schaffartzik, A., Giljum, S., Engler, J.-O., Feller, R. L., Hubacek, K., & Wieland, H. (2021). Global patterns of ecologically unequal exchange: Implications for sustainability in the 21st century. Ecological Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106824
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.