The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Bactericidal Activity of Bovine Serums Against Coliform Organisms Isolated from Milk of Mastitic Udders, Udder Skin, and Environment
Abstract
SUMMARY: Six strains of Klebsiella sp. isolated from mouth, udder skin, and milk of mastitic udders of cows, 6 coliform organisms from milk of acutely mastitic udders, 10 coliform organisms from the barn floor, and 1 stock strain of Aerobacter aerogenes (2414-2) were tested by spectrophotometric bactericidal assay against dilutions of serums (with and without added complement) of cows of known infection history. All degrees of susceptibility of the organisms to the bactericidal effects of serum were seen: The stock strain of A. aerogenes was highly susceptible; 2 strains of Klebsiella and 2 strains of coliforms from the barn floor were moderately susceptible; and the remaining strains were highly resistant. Addition of complement to the serums did not potentiate the reaction, but usually stimulated growth of the inoculums or might have inhibited the bactericidal action. Heating the serums at 56 C. for 30 minutes destroyed most of the bactericidal activity. Serums were variable in their potency against susceptible organisms, and the bactericidal activity was not significantly greater in the older cows which had had coliform mastitis.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The percentage of isolates from intramammary infections susceptible to the bactericidal and bacteriostatic activities of bovine serum is similar to the percentage of serum susceptible coliform isolates existing in the environment of the cow.
“The percentage of isolates from intramammary infections susceptible to the bactericidal and bacteriostatic activities of bovine serum is similar to the percentage of serum susceptible coliform isolates existing in the environment of the cow [5].”
From Coliform mastitis (2003) · cites this paper as [5]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hogan, J., & Larry Smith, K. (2003) · Veterinary Research · doi:10.1051/vetres:2003022 · Cited by 245
Serum Susceptibility of Coliforms Isolated from Bovine Intramammary Infections
Hogan, J. S., Todhunter, D. A., Smith, K. L., & Schoenberger, P. S. (1989) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(89)79308-5 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Carroll, E. J.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Davis (US)
- Corresponding author
- Carroll, E. J.
- Venue
- American Journal of Veterinary Research
- Published
- 1971-05-01
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 689-702
- ISSN
- 0002-9645 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4409131216
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 1.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Veterinary Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Milk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal health and immunology
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Microbial infections and disease research
- Keywords
- coliform bacteria, bovine mastitis, Klebsiella, Enterobacter aerogenes, complement system, serum heat inactivation, cow age, serum susceptibility
- MeSH terms
- Air Microbiology, Animals, Antibodies, Bacteria, Cattle, Colostrum, Complement Fixation Tests, Enterobacter, Escherichia coli, Female, Immune Sera, Indicator Dilution Techniques, Klebsiella, Mammary Glands, Animal, Mastitis, Bovine, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Milk
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review