Cited by 14Microbial infections and disease researchAnimal health and immunologyMilk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows

Behavioral and physiologic changes in Holstein steers experimentally infected with Mannheimia haemolytica

Eberhart, Nicole L., Storer, Jennifer M., Caldwell, Marc, Saxton, Arnold M., Krawczel, Peter D.·2017·American Journal of Veterinary Research

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To evaluate changes in behavior and surfactant protein (SP) A and D concentrations in serum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) samples of calves experimentally infected with Mannheimia haemolytica. ANIMALS Twelve 4- to 5-month-old Holstein steers. PROCEDURES Calves were divided into 2 treatment groups and instrumented with a data logger to collect behavioral data. After 10 days of acclimation, calves were experimentally inoculated with 3 × 10 9 CFUs to 5 × 10 9 CFUs of M haemolytica suspended in approximately 5 mL of PBS solution (infected calves; n = 6) or 5 mL of PBS solution without M haemolytica (control calves; 6) through a catheter into the right accessory lung lobe. Calves were clinically evaluated twice daily for 7 days after inoculation. Blood and BALF samples were collected from all calves at predetermined times for determination of serum and BALF SP-A and SP-D concentrations. Serum and BALF concentrations of SP-A and SP-D and behavioral data were evaluated over time and between treatment groups. RESULTS Compared with control calves, infected calves spent more time lying in general and more time lying on the right side during the 24 hours and 6 days after inoculation, respectively. Mean rectal temperature for infected calves (41.3°C) was significantly greater than that for control calves (39.2°C) 12 hours after inoculation. Mean respiratory rate for infected calves (52.5 breaths/min) was significantly greater than that for control calves (45.4 breaths…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2460/ajvr.78.9.1056

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eberhart, N. L., Storer, J. M., Caldwell, M., Saxton, A. M., & Krawczel, P. D.
Venue
American Journal of Veterinary Research
Published
2017-09
Volume
78
Issue
9
Pages
1056-1064
ISSN
0002-9645 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2746176122
Cited by
14
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Veterinary Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Microbial infections and disease research
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal health and immunology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Milk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows
Keywords
Mannheimia haemolytica, experimental infection, Holstein steers, calves, surfactant protein A, surfactant protein D, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, serum biomarkers, behavioral monitoring, rectal temperature, respiratory rate, lying behavior, bovine respiratory disease
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Body Temperature, Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid, Cattle, Cattle Diseases, Mannheimia haemolytica, Pneumonia of Calves, Enzootic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review