Cited by 45Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesAnimal health and immunologyMicrobial infections and disease research

Behavioral changes in group-housed dairy calves infected with Mannheimia haemolytica

Open access
Hixson, C.L., Krawczel, P.D., Caldwell, J.M., Miller-Cushon, E.K.·2018·Journal of Dairy Science

Abstract

Monitoring sickness behavior may improve identification, management, and welfare of sick animals. The objective of this study was to characterize components of sickness behavior in group-housed dairy calves, using an experimental disease challenge model with Mannheimia haemolytica (MH). Holstein bull calves (aged 3–7 weeks; 58.0 ± 12.0 kg of body weight) were group-housed based on age and body weight in sand-bedded pens (6 calves/pen, 6.6 m 2 /calf) and provided pasteurized waste milk (8 L/d) 2×/d and grain concentrate ad libitum. Within group, calves were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 treatments: (1) inoculation at the tracheal bifurcation with 3 × 10 9 cfu of MH suspended in 5 mL of sterile phosphate buffered saline (PBS) followed by a 120 mL wash PBS (MH; n=12, 3/pen), or (2) inoculation with 5 mL + 120 mL of sterile PBS only (control; n=12, 3/pen). Rectal temperature and health scores were collected from d 0 to +6 of the challenge. A range of behaviors, including feeding patterns and social interactions, were recorded from video from d 0 to +2. The challenge model resulted in calves experiencing a mild disease state: rectal temperatures of MH calves were elevated throughout the challenge compared with control calves, peaking at 12 h postinoculation (39.2 vs. 38.9°C; standard error=0.14). Many behavioral responses were subject to treatment by day effects, with calves generally becoming less active following inoculation with MH and then returning to baseline. Affected behaviors surrounding feeding included milk feeding time, frequency of competitive displacements, and concentrate feeding time. Lying time was similarly subject to treatment by day effects, and MH calves also spent more time lying on their left side compared with their right (604 vs. 471 min/h; standard error=32), whereas control calves expressed no laterality. Duration of social lying did not differ, but frequency of social lying bouts decreased in MH calves following inoculation (0.44 vs. 0.75 bouts/h; standard error=0.04). Social grooming was initiated less by MH calves (0.78 vs. 1.96 min/h; standard error=0.38), but they tended to receive more social grooming for a greater duration of time (1.59 vs. 1.25 min/h; standard error=0.13). Overall, we found that infected calves exhibited reduced grooming, feeding, and social interactions, suggesting that these behavioral changes may be useful indicators of early stages of respiratory disease.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3168/jds.2018-14832

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Calves with poor weaning outcomes displayed a decreased drinking rate and shorter suckling times.

    “The collected data from non-nutritive visits revealed that calves with poor weaning outcomes displayed a decreased drinking rate and shorter suckling times [104,230].”

    From Strategies for Bovine Respiratory Disease (BRD) Diagnosis and Prognosis: A Comprehensive Overview (2024) · cites this paper as [230]

    The Results (page not provided) report shorter nonnutritive suckling visits in calves inoculated with Mannheimia haemolytica than in controls. The study examined a disease challenge, not poor weaning outcomes, and the cited passages do not report a decreased drinking rate; they report no difference in the frequency of nonnutritive visits. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hixson, C. L., Krawczel, P. D., Caldwell, J. M., & Miller-Cushon, E. K.
Affiliations
  • University of Florida (US)
  • University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
Corresponding author
Miller-Cushon, E.K.
Venue
Journal of Dairy Science
Published
2018-11
Volume
101
Issue
11
Pages
10351-10360
ISSN
0022-0302 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2892199289
Cited by
45
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5
FWCI
5.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Dairy Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Food and Agriculture (1005725)
  • Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (1005725)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal health and immunology
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Microbial infections and disease research
Keywords
Mannheimia haemolytica, bovine respiratory disease, dairy calves, sickness behavior, group housing, rectal temperature, feeding behavior, social interaction, lying behavior, social grooming, animal welfare, Holstein bull calves, behavioral phenotyping, welfare interventions
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Body Weight, Cattle, Cattle Diseases, Edible Grain, Feeding Behavior, Grooming, Male, Random Allocation, Mannheimia haemolytica, Pneumonia of Calves, Enzootic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review